The earth will be destroyed at 11/9 by cern and the LHC.

Genome scans have turned up single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with different responses to treatment, but efforts to uncover the mechanism have drawn a blank

The LHC reminds me of that ancient story of some great society that built a tower to
reach God/heaven. People using technology to figure out life mysteries is a bad idea.

My understanding is that any problems won't be when they turn it on, but as they ramp it up to 7Tev. The question is supposedly one of the generation of stable di-baryons. Unstable quarks are gone faster than you can think about blinking your eyes, existing for only millionths of a second. The stable ones are a different animal, almost like an atom made up only of quarks. By definition, strangelets are...strange. We are on the front end of this research, and besides, it is well documented that science fiction often becomes science fact in the long run. I have read that the info released by CERN scientists indicates there is ONLY a 20% chance of the so-called ICE-9 reaction occuring. Who cares if the name came from science fiction. They named it that not because it was in a book, but because the strangeness of such a proposed reaction resembles what happened in the book. If we can release such awesome energy from the fissioning and fusioning of atomic nuclei, what kind of energies are possible when we release the energy of quarks? I don't think it will happen, but could it? Damn right it COULD. It wouldn't happen at first, as I said, but only after they ramp that puppy up. The problem is that the best physicists in the world aren't sure themselves. How do the rest of us follow such complexity? I'm not a conspiracy theorist, and I think it's possible. I think it's very interesting.

reply to post by deadred


No conspiracy theorist huh...

How far does your knowledge go ? Are you a scientist yourself ?

Sinter, I am not a scientist with paper, i.e. degrees. My career was Surgery as an OR Tech for 8 years, and as a PA 1st assistant for specialist surgeons for 24 years. I have the equivalent of about 3 masters degrees in biology, physiology, and anatomy. I've studied esoteric science and philosophy, as well as physics and cosmology for about 35 years, and while that dyxlexia limits me in math (you oughta try to do equations when your brain mistakenly puts variables in strange places), I do have an understanding of many of these theories based on deep outside research. I've learned much more since quitting college than I ever did when I went. I could study what I wanted and not have to vomit data back to professors. Helping do surgery for over three decades helped me develop tremendous concentration, and I have a great memory. I don't claim to be any kind of expert on anything except surgery, ham radio, football, baseball, and guitar, but I am not uninformed about a wide variety of subjects. I believe intelligence and understanding can be both broad and deep, and I've spent my adult life on these pursuits. I'm 57, so I'm not a new kid on the block. I always enjoy your posts and hope we can continue to interact. Rick, aka deadred

Originally posted by deadred
My understanding is that any problems won't be when they turn it on, but as they ramp it up to 7Tev. The question is supposedly one of the generation of stable di-baryons. Unstable quarks are gone faster than you can think about blinking your eyes, existing for only millionths of a second. The stable ones are a different animal, almost like an atom made up only of quarks. By definition, strangelets are...strange. We are on the front end of this research, and besides, it is well documented that science fiction often becomes science fact in the long run. I have read that the info released by CERN scientists indicates there is ONLY a 20% chance of the so-called ICE-9 reaction occuring. Who cares if the name came from science fiction. They named it that not because it was in a book, but because the strangeness of such a proposed reaction resembles what happened in the book. If we can release such awesome energy from the fissioning and fusioning of atomic nuclei, what kind of energies are possible when we release the energy of quarks? I don't think it will happen, but could it? Damn right it COULD. It wouldn't happen at first, as I said, but only after they ramp that puppy up. The problem is that the best physicists in the world aren't sure themselves. How do the rest of us follow such complexity? I'm not a conspiracy theorist, and I think it's possible. I think it's very interesting.

Well said. Am I the only sheep that thinks that smashing atomic particles together is a bad idea? Seems a bit like hitting an unexploded bomb with a hammer. Sure it MAY not explode...but chances are....lol.

reply to post by UnknownSheep


Yes, but think of all we could learn from that "Bomb" every time we hit it with that hammer.......

youtu.be...

Originally posted by Teeky
The LHC reminds me of that ancient story of some great society that built a tower to
reach God/heaven. People using technology to figure out life mysteries is a bad idea.

I beg to differ. I think technology and science are an excellent idea to uncover live mysteries. And no, apart from the occasional malfunctiong that just requires to shut the thing down and repair it, no harm will ever come from it. (Except for the huge amount of money it consumes, but better spend that kind of money on such research than on WMD research and production. If you are really interested and worried, just go to their site or to other scientific sites that address the common fear that it is a doomsday device.

I've watched CERN's website since '95 when they had a daily meter showing how much dark matter they had accumulated.

Years before LHC opened, they had a figure of 10% chance of making the Big Bang. Everybody hooped and hollered that the figure represented an unacceptable risk ratio. So, they changed it to 1%. Same-o, same-o. Still too much risk. They kept posting a smaller figure as people griped. Eventually, they admitted, they have no way of knowing. They have no way to determine the 'risk factor'.

So, it's essentially a giant underground gambling casino - and our lives are their chips.

Kinda staying in the CERN relm here. I remember reading back about oh a year or so about a Iberworld Airbus A330-300 flown by Air Comet which was ready to begin its descent into Santa Cruz, Bolivia, but then found itself ‘instantly and mysteriously’ over the skies of Santa Cruz (de Tenerife), Spain over 5,500 miles (8,900 km) away.
Now thinking back it had some thing about the CERN system was causing some sort of gravitational distortion and all these weird little happenings started taking place.I am pretty battle stoned to most subjects on ATS I see some very brilliant people in here and some that could just cause stupid to look smart..But of all things that I believe in CERN and bio-cloning etc... I love the subjects and think we can learn alot. But I also know that when charting the uncharted mistakes happen and as long as we evolve and learn from those mistakes we can move forward. But as much as I love physics the uncharted dangers are what causes my neck hairs to stand up.
I don't think much about other countries blowing the planet up..And well because anyone who wants control that bad isn't dumb enough to wack them selves to get that control i.e. where the nations of the world are today...But when scientist go into uncharted waters they can only prepare for so much because the data we have is based on the relm of here and now.
We have no relm of research in mass into undiscovered elements and beyond. The un clear danger of what could be waiting in nano elements and beyond is just very spooky. With all the fail safes and trouble shooting all it takes is someone who was to over stimulated and un rested and over caffinated to over calculate and we could be opening up some kinda damn vortexand what only knows might result.Any way back to the plane has anyone ever see this any where it kinda has stuck in my mind for a year or so now...?

reply to post by deadred


Hi.


I was only curious .

You seem like an interesting guy, and I'm honored you enjoy my posts.
Well... I honestly can't think of anything to write right now...

Thank you.

Until next time.

~ Nick A.K.A. Sinter

Originally posted by Sinter Klaas
Well that's basically what I've read .

They will do so by creating a new and improved quark on steroids. from or by something they call stranglettes.

The creation will kickstart a series of effects resulting in Earth going super nova what will crush the planet to a solid ball of mere 7 kilometers wide. They called it ice-9 reaction.

Source : A Factory of Quark Gluon Soup: The cause of big-bangs and supernovas.

Personally I'm convinced it's a bunch of nonsense. It was a fun read tho and I've never heard it before.
So please ATS set loose the debunk talent what makes this place famous.

Rip out the lies so hard that site has to end its broadcasting days.

And...

I want to make sure they are not even slightly telling some truth... Just to be save...

~ Sinter

edit on 10/24/2010 by Sinter Klaas because: Change dat from 9/11 to 11/9

btw its 11/10/10... And i am still here...
idiots...

reply to post by Sinter Klaas


The Earth is still here my friend.

2nd

reply to post by 8fl0z


Honestly.... I didn't even had a doubt we would be save.

Unfortunately my imagination was not able to come up with this stuff.

Why do you even bother to reply when you're only telling me something I know, since I'm still here

reply to post by kaskade


Grow up.

Only a child repeats the the obvious.

reply to post by SLAYER69


Ahhhhck, the engines can't take it anymore captain! Besides, social security needs your hard earned dollars.

People should start getting banned for making retarded predictions, it's basically borderline trolling.
I'm going to start trolling hard If I keep seeing religious nuts thinking they're Miss Cleo.........

Originally posted by Teeky
The LHC reminds me of that ancient story of some great society that built a tower to
reach God/heaven. People using technology to figure out life mysteries is a bad idea.

The tower of babel. You sir, are on to something..

2.

i guess it didnt work since we are all still here.

reply to post by tim3lord


They haven't had their breakfast yet, give them a chance. So impatient for the end of the world.;I
would imagine it will happen about lunchtime after they've warmed the machine up and performed a couple of dud runs.

At this lull in the action, I'd like to say thank you to those who contributed here and gave us some background information. I was under the impression that the actual collision process was within safe boundaries, and see that it likely still is. I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned yet: the earthquake concerns. Any takes on it?

The magnetic field within the lhc tunnel. Outside of the beam tubes is still 3 million times greater than the earth’s magnetic field

CERN people adduce that because the gravitomagnetic fields of the LHC are not ‘colosal’, they should not have the energy to provoke earthquakes. But earthquakes only need a ‘butterfly effect’. Simple mine explosions have caused them. Air bombing has caused them… Since the energy of the earthquake is already stored as potential energy in the fault. So you just need a chaotic, butterfly effect multiplied by the fault to release its energy. Earthquakes are in that sense similar to an avalanche. And the LHC has enough potency to be the butterfly…

In the graph we can see how strong those fields are and how they spread outside the ring into the rock formation under the Jura mountains.

We cannot pretend to know exactly how the huge LHC magnetic field is affecting the Earth; as we don’t have reliable maps of the entire Earth’s field. Yet the causality in time is there: we know that any new source added to a magnetic field modifes its structure. In April we introduce a new top magnetic field on this planet and the surge in Earthquakes peaked.

www.cerntruth.com...