Originally posted by Amadeus
First off, it was DAVID and NOT his illegitimate half Jebusite son , so be a little more careful with your facts…
Yes, that was an undeniable mistake on my part.
But back to the Numbers 21:5 pericope in the TORAH regarding Moses’ Bronze Snake Idol Thingy on a Pole, grammatically linked to the cultic Burning of
Incense in many other places in the Old Testament:
See, i was refering to the Christian Bible. You are obviously making a distinction between the Old testament and the Torah, and as i have not had a
chance to read the Torah, I can not prepare a rebuttle to your arguement.
“And Hezekiah demolished all the high places, and smashed all the idols, and cut down all the groves, and ground to powder the brass serpent (idol)
that Moses had made: for in those days the sons of Israel burned incense to it: and [Hezekiah] nicknamed it “Nehushtan”.--2 Kings 18:4.
I think i said this in my previous post, but I want to mention that WHEN they started worshiping it, it was destroyed...nothing wrong there?
Context may help a little here. In the Hezekiah periscope, clearly you can see that the “sons of Israel” had taken to the burning of incense to the
Nahash --- they were not merely just “looking upon it”.
yes, i am agreeing with you here.
See Amos 5:22 "Even though you offer up to Me burnt offerings and your grain offerings, I will not smell them : I will not look at the peace
offerings of your fatlings.
(“look upon” in parallelism with “smell” (KJV = “accept”) = the cultic sense of “smelling a sacrifice” e.g. is cultically incense related to
“looking” in the older pre-Exilic Hebrew of Amos)
Or see another early pre-Exilic Hebrew verse:= same parallelism with word INCENSE spelled out clearly :
=proto-Isaiah 17:8 =
He will not “smell” the altars, the work of his hands, Nor will he “look upon” that which his fingers have made, Even the Asherim and the incense
stands.
Notice how the word “regard” is in poetic parallelism to “look upon” : and the term “regard” is a technical cultic term for burning incense among
other things, so the two are related in purely cultic setting in this case
I disagree here. Yes, they are used in the same sentence, speaking about the same thing, but that does not mean they mean the same thing.
I also would like to apologize.I don't know if you have noticed, but many people on this forum post without knowing much about what they are saying,
they just want to bash christians and dont really know what they are saying. Because of this, I dont listen as well as i should. You have proven me
wrong though, since obviously you have done your research. I am sorry if I came off harsh or cold in any way, you did not deserve it. You make a very
good arguement, i have to say, and It gets my way-above vote this month, if only for totally shocking me by actually knowing what you are talking
about-although i still disagree.
---pineapple
edit: heh, i guess ill be voting for you NEXT month...i forgot i already used mine already. Its the thought that counts though, right?
[edit on 29-6-2004 by pineappleupsidedown]