Nazca-SA Tectonic Plate Boundary is Freaking Out With Quakes!

Speaking of earthquakes, I think the elite are preparing and building underground shelters for the chosen few.

In the past week there have been 44 earthquakes just north of Little Rock, Arkansas. This is an area that hardly ever gets earthquakes.

earthquake.usgs.gov...



ALL of the "earthquakes" have been at a depth of 3 miles or less. VERY shallow for earthquakes.

More like a depth for some very large underground blasting.

Also take note of the longitude and latitude. They are almost identical.

earthquake.usgs.gov...

Originally posted by Granite
reply to post by TrueAmerican

 

www.nealadams.com...
You missed the memo...

I seen that Neal Adams theory a few years ago when he only had Vid #0 on, and it was pretty believable even then.
Now with all the extra stuff on the Moon, Mars, Ganymede and some of the other Planets Moons and more detailed stuff on India, the Great Lakes, the Eurasian Seas its even more convincing.

I need to get my head around his "folding mountains" part though, both the Andes and the Kermadec Ridge on opposite sides of the Pacific Spreading Plate seem to work in a similar fashion, but without subduction how do you explain how the earthquakes get deeper the further inland from the edges of the upper crust (continents) you go

Hey seriously, thanks to all who have replied with great info here.

One of the fascinating things to look at is another event query for 4.0+ quakes from January 1, 2010 to February 26, 2010. On Feb 26, here is how things looked for scientists. Little did they know that the very next day, one of the largest quakes ever recorded was about to rip apart the Chilean coastline with an 8.8!



It appears that all the warning they might have had was a couple of smaller quakes very close to the epicenter of what was getting ready to happen. And I suppose this furthers the lesson that once quakes occur in a spot and activity starts- to be on the lookout for additional imminent activity.

As you can see the big quake in Haiti had recently occurred. Should they have taken any clues from this that a counter adjustment further south might be imminent? And worse, should we be taking clues from all of this that further adjustments will be forthcoming? If so, then where? Well, I put in my guess...Anyone else wanna post theirs?

So beyond that even, it is very interesting to compare the time periods and quakes that have occurred since the big 8.8. If you look closely between the query maps, you can see how activity appears to be increasing in the very prediction circle and north of there. Should we be taking a clue?

I dunno. Time will tell.

Here is the Sept 1 to Oct 23 map again, so you can more easily see what I am saying:

Hi Muzzy,
His analysis of the South American continent needs some data and supporting evidence...he seems to assume "we" know all of it already...that is my criticism.
He wrote the western side seabed-rifting is massive and pushing against the region in the OP. Where is the analysis though?
I want to find out more about the rifting...

reply to post by TrueAmerican


Very interesting. Earthquakes are really difficult to predict. Does the incidence of more quakes mean there is a big one coming or does it mean that pressure has been released thus lessening the chance of a big quake?

I dont think the experts know for sure.

I really worry about the California coast. There have been some really big quakes there in the past and its not a matter of if, but when the next big one will strike. The populations of these areas are huge and would no doubt do tremendous damage.

The Bay area hasnt had a 6.0 or higher since 89'(7.1) and it seems like when they get a quake its a big one.

I hope you are wrong but history shows that these quakes will keep coming.

reply to post by iamcamouflage


Well, one of the things I am going to do is start pulling event queries for bigger quakes only. First 5's +, then 6+.

Since those release so much more energy, there might be some patterns that could emerge....

Unfortunately, query is down right now. Networks are still in trouble- tech probs...

reply to post by TrueAmerican


So your theory, and thats just what it is, is that a bigger quake will hit the region.

Perhaps the person brushed you off as he may be on the other end thinking that these are domino effects to elevate stress and that nothing more will come of it.

But then .. that won't give you the hits or attention you seek based on your scientific observation.

Well, i have just remembered a converatoin I had once with an friend, back in mid-may this year... She said that there will be a "big one" scale 9+, Chilean north...
Ok a little context. She's been all her life the kind of mystical person she is now, she says she recieves messages from her "guides" and talks about aura, and inner energy and lots of new age stuff...
I, for one, think shes honest with her prediction, but she offers nothing to back up her claims, except her word... but she did mention something about being in a certain part of the country between the 5th and 21 of each month, that she would be safe there, and her familly as well...
weird, after reading the op. made me remember all this talk i had with her that time...
and, if it turns out like that, well, the eq from feb 27 would be nothing compared with the one coming...
oh, she didn't say when, just where and between the above mentioned dates, no month or year thou'...

reply to post by Heyyo_yoyo


Thanks for that.

And the volcano issue raises a point. Yeah, there are a ton of volcanoes there, no doubt. But I suppose one thing to keep in mind is that huge quakes are not generally the product of volcanoes, or those processes. They are usually more the product of tectonics, which is more my focus with this topic. However, if something like Yellowstone or Toba went off again (supervolcanoes) we might see some big quakes like that.

No doubt tectonic quakes can affect the volcanoes though. So sure, it is somewhat tied together in that sense.

And this difference is one reason I really want to start pulling queries on the bigger quakes, to help separate the two, and hopefully be able to see a clearer picture. But even then I realize it will still be nothing more than a glimpse into blurry speculation.

Those that come into the thread trying to point that out to me by cutesy remarks to remind me of my junk science are just simply no fun! Don't ya think?

TA, nothing wrong with doing some research and see what comes up

reply to post by muzzy


Yeah, thanks.

So since I have found this little query-plot thingy, I am having hella fun pulling different queries for quakes all over the place and with different magnitudes- and over different date ranges.

So here is one that was pretty interesting to me. It is all quakes worldwide 8+ mag from 1-1-2000 to 10-25-10. That's nearly 11 years of the biggest quakes at a glance.



I thought it was curious that they are all shallow, except for one. And that is the selected yellow one.

But perhaps an even bigger issue is the LACK of any big quakes 8 or over all through Alaska, the west coast, and all down central America. Pressure has been building. And the scientists have been screaming it for at least a decade that the big one is coming.

You may also notice another big quake close to the prediction circle. The funny thing is, and I swear to God, I had no idea that had even occurred when I made that prediction. I told you, this is junk science! That quake happened June 23, 2001. Back in 2001 I knew earthquakes in general existed, and that's about it. Just gotten into this last couple years.

But since that did occur about 9 years ago, the good news is that major stress was relieved. The bad news is that once a quake that big has occurred somewhere- what that says is that yes, whatever is down there can do it again at that spot or close to it. The mechanism to produce that big a quake is there. But chances are, it probably won't for a while.

So in light of that quake, it looks like the big 8.8 further south may have been the equilibrium to that quake. Leaving the north and south extremes of the entire west coast of South America as the more likely places for the next big one there. So I'll change my prediction for those spots instead. Either the very southern tip of Chile, or the coast of North Peru, coast of Ecuador, maybe coast of Columbia. But since the trend seems to be headed south, the southern tip of Chile could be it.

It was 9 years or so between the big ones, if that means anything. 2020? Nah, we all die in 2012, remember?

ETA: Quake on the west Chile Rise, 5.4 just happened. I know that's southwest, but at least we're moving south!

earthquake.usgs.gov...
earthquake.usgs.gov...

Magnitude 5.4
Date-Time Tuesday, October 26, 2010 at 02:08:29 UTC
Monday, October 25, 2010 at 08:08:29 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 41.492°S, 85.710°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region WEST CHILE RISE
Distances 990 km (620 miles) W of Castro, Los Lagos, Chile
1065 km (660 miles) SSW of San Juan Bautista, Juan Fernandez Is.
1605 km (990 miles) SW of SANTIAGO, Region Metropolitana, Chile
2490 km (1540 miles) WSW of BUENOS AIRES, D.F., Argentina

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 11.3 km (7.0 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST=126, Nph=126, Dmin=>999 km, Rmss=1.37 sec, Gp= 76°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=8
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID usa00044he