reply to post by jibeho
Given that WaPo is notoriously slanted in favor of the Obama administration and the home of the staunchest liberals in "journalism" (birthplace of
the journo-list), this has got to be seen as either a shot across the bow, or the tipping point at which even liberal ideologues have to say "enough
is enough."
I was so surprised as I progressed through the story that I had to re-check to make sure that this was, indeed, the Post. I kept expecting the big
qualification, or weaselly :but then again," that never came.
If even the WaPo editors found Holder's Justice to so morally (and legally) bankrupt to endorse publication, rather than bury or kill it, the truth
must be FAR worse.
Will it go into the Whitehouse? How long before someone asks, "What did the president know, and when did he know it?"
Finally!
Look what they've done to my Country.
jw



