It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.popularmechanics.com...
The current thorium mineral reserve estimates (in tons)[1]:
* 360,000 India
* 300,000 Australia
* 170,000 Norway
* 160,000 United States
* 100,000 Canada
* 35,000 South Africa
* 16,000 Brazil
* 95,000 Others
Originally posted by TortoiseKweek
reply to post by Hellmutt
Yeah, and a South African columnist identifies it as a potentially replaceable source for the Pebble Bed Reactor at Koeberg, Cape Town.
thoriummsr.wordpress.com...
The energy conundrum and a home-grown solution
Talking at a public discussion in Johannesburg recently on the subject of this country’s future energy needs, Bobby Godsell was reported as saying he thinks as much as 20 000 megawatts of the estimated 40 000 megawatts required could come from nuclear energy. That was followed by a comment by Dipuo Peters, Minister for Energy, saying there was concern about the availability of a supply of enriched uranium – because it is said the Chinese are taking up increasing quantities of what’s available out of Africa.
Originally posted by Aquarius1
Thorium has nearly 200 times the energy content of uranium without creating plutonium—an ingredient for nuclear weapons. Is this the nuclear fuel of the future?
If there is free energy technology out there which isn't dangerous and doesn't cause illness we should be using it, as long as big oil is controlling our power and the money it doesn't look like anything will change soon.
Originally posted by leira7
reply to post by Aquarius1
Perhaps soundwaves and sacred geometry may help us to find the key mechanism that fuels creation in this Universe. Everything needs sound/vibration to move.
Originally posted by ADUB77
Here are the problems with Thorium
There are no mines that produce solely Thorium
There are no exploration companies looking for Thorium
There are no reactors currently built, that could use Thorium
Also, when you read that there is more Thorium than Uranium, it is misguiding
Have you ever heard that there's more gold in the ocean than all of land...but it is so microscopic we do not have the technology to get it...
Same thing applies here, Thorium is abundant in the Earth's core, HOWEVER, it is NOT found in "Deposits"
that would make it feasibly possible to mine.
This is why Thorium is produced as a by-product to thing likes Uranium
There are reactors that are currently built that CAN use thorium. CANDU reactors, which are canadian designed, can use thorium fuel with some modification.
Chinese Support Thorium and AECL
It is exciting times ahead and thorium is a feasible option. If not an alternative, a welcome addition to existing uranium based reactors.
t 12:30 am, on August 26, 1977, the operators at the Shippingport Atomic Power Station began lifting the central modules of the experimental breeder reactor core into the blanket section. At 04:38 am, the reactor reached criticality. During the next five years, the core produced more than 10 billion kilowatt-hours of thermal power - equivalent to about 2.5 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power - with a current retail value of approximately $200 million.
It showed no signs of approaching the end of its useful life. It was obvious from the core performance that the reactor was at least a very efficient converter with a long life core. However, in October, 1982, the reactor was shut down for the final time under budgetary pressures and a desire to conduct the detailed fuel examination needed to determine if breeding had actually occurred.
A report on the experiment was quietly issued in 1987. The core contained approximately 1.3% more fissile material after producing heat for five years than it did before initial operation. Breeding had occurred in a light water reactor system using most of the same equipment as used for conventional reactor plants.
The potential use of thorium nuclear fuel in Areva's pressurized water reactors will be investigated. An "initial collaborative agreement" towards that end was made between Areva and Thorium Power on 23 July which will see the French firm pay Thorium on a monthly basis to begin studies relating to its EPR design. If the "general results on evolutionary approaches to the use of Thorium" are up to scratch, the program will be worth $550,000 to Thorium, while Areva will be able to keep the resulting intellectual property. Following this, further agreements towards new products and technologies could be made.
Thorium has nearly 200 times the energy content of uranium without creating plutonium—an ingredient for nuclear weapons. Is this the nuclear fuel of the future?
If Thorium is the answer opposed to uranium that is the way we should go. Nuclear power and plants can be very dangerous as evidenced by Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. We were very lucky with the melt down at Three Mile Island.
Well, existing nuclear is one of the safer forms of energy (factually). It's also possible to design uranium fueled reactors that are impossible to meltdown, it depends on the design. We demonstrated this in the same month Chernobyl occurred. That reactor also utilized Uranium over 100 times more efficiently than existing reactors, and the waste lasted a couple hundred years (instead of hundreds of thousands).
Originally posted by Aquarius1
reply to post by C0bzz
Well, existing nuclear is one of the safer forms of energy (factually). It's also possible to design uranium fueled reactors that are impossible to meltdown, it depends on the design. We demonstrated this in the same month Chernobyl occurred. That reactor also utilized Uranium over 100 times more efficiently than existing reactors, and the waste lasted a couple hundred years (instead of hundreds of thousands).
There seems to be a lot of controversy on how long the waste lasts, hard to know what is truth, if you remember they wanted to store Nuclear waste a few years ago at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, the State and people were up in arms over that, the big concern was leakage in the future from an earthquake or natural earth movement. I can understand that, wouldn't want it stored in my back yard.
Thanks for the information and video.