reply to post by mossme89
Kudos to the OP. Great thread, great topic.
Obviously, a given Individual must explore such concepts primarily from an intuitive perspective...although the artform of mathematics offers hints of
not only the multidimensionality of existence, of reality, but also the ORDER from which springs the countless blueprints for us to employ when
creating our own versions/variations of same. I'm referencing, in part here, theoretical physicist David Bohm's Implicate/Explicate Orders as well
as Gary Zukov's Wu Li Masters. I have also found Deepak Chopra's ideas to be interesting and, for me, have proven to be worthy of exploration as
well. And the Seth Information channeled by Jane Roberts (contemporarily built upon by Elias who is channeled by Mary Ennis) is what I eventually
settled upon and subscribe to...NOT because one is right so the other MUST be wrong, but rather I have found that the Seth Information seems to result
in my being much more intuitively receptive to it, and comfortable with it. But, of course, when exploring similar subjects matter, there are bound
to be common threads encountered. As Egg Shen said: there's Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoist Alchemian Sorcery...we take what we want, and leave
the rest. Ha, ha.
In my own experience, I have found that applying physically-derived dualistic principles (truths) to dimensional probabilities NOT necessarily mired
within the parameters of a basic physical reality blueprint can result in all sorts of absolute and, quite probably, misleading conclusions; and
handcuffing myself with what I consider to be exceedingly limited explorative boundaries by applying any form of absolute truth conclusion is not
necessarily the way to go. Thusly, and on a personal level, I have chosen to take virtually ALL conclusions concerning reality and existence with the
proverbial grain of salt; with the knowledge that existence continues merrily along both because of my explorations and, of course, in spite of
them.
Now, this is NOT to say that I experience no revulsion whatsoever to given and perceived...evil...events (the child rape scenario offered by a
previous member is, to me, particularly heinous); but the personal and explorative CONTEXT into which I try to place such distasteful encounters DOES
seem to result in more of an understanding/acceptance of how a specific event fits into the [possible] larger scheme of things. For me, this approach
to interacting with the reality I create DOES appear to limit the measure and scope of emotional insertion I levy ONTO that event and, thusly, seems
to allow for more of a detached frame of reference...weighing the event instead of judging it. Obviously, if I happened upon the child rape event in
person, it would undoubtedly be A$$-KICKING TIME. I know, I know...I'm being rather absolute here, but I guess recognizing it as such does mark some
measure of personal understanding; perhaps not. Who the hell knows?
In short, I try to have a flexible, almost chameleonic, belief system which seems to be more evaluative and, perhaps, more understanding and accepting
of the overall relationship OF an event to the larger scheme of things than the previous (and much more judgmental) systems I have applied in this,
and countless other, lives. And it is this interactive strategy which today seems to result in my being able to rein in what could otherwise be my
emotions...absolutely...running amok.
Thanks again OP!
Mindpeace
The check is in the mail...Jack Burton