It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

What is the WATS score that is now on our profiles?

page: 1

log in


posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 11:01 PM
Can anybody explain what it is, how it is calculated and how we understand it? I assume it replaces the "flag contribution level" that used to appear on our profiles but I would like to know how it works.

posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 11:04 PM
reply to post by Sestias

It has already been explained many of times.

(FLAGS x 5(stars)) = WATS

posted on Oct, 18 2010 @ 12:00 PM
reply to post by Misoir

Thank you. I must have missed the many explanations, as I have a life outside of ATS. Appreciate the info.

posted on Apr, 1 2012 @ 11:47 AM
reply to post by Misoir

(FLAGS x 5(stars)) = WATS

This doesn't seem right going on my wats score.

Can anyone shed any light on the algorithm used for the wats score please?

posted on Apr, 1 2012 @ 05:37 PM
reply to post by OccamAssassin

Several months after I posted that the owners had changed how the scoring was done. That was how it used to be calculated; not anymore.

posted on Apr, 1 2012 @ 05:55 PM
reply to post by Misoir

Thanks Misoir.

posted on Apr, 1 2012 @ 06:33 PM
W = (posts / 600) + (flags / 80) + (stars / 170)


W = (4074 posts / 600) + (524 flags / 80) + (7619 stars / 170)
W = 6.79 + 6.55 + 44.81
W = 58.15 rounded to 58.

The bang for the buck here is in flags which has the smallest denominator of 80. The LEAST bang for the buck is in posts which has the largest denominator of 600. Stars, with a denominator of 170, are worth a little less than half what flags are (.46). It is NOT about quantity, but about starting threads. Mere posts in this equation do not earn you much at all relative to the other two metrics. If you earn no stars or flags, your WATS score is relatively low in the scheme of things. Quantity is a factor, but it is the least relevant factor of them all.

This, by the way, is precisely what Skeptic Overlord has said about the matter in previous posts. He didn't give us the formula that I recall, but he did say that WATS was a way of rewarding thread starters in his "User provided content" theme of ATS.

Now, K = Karma

K = (stars * 15) + ((flags + applause) * 10) / posts


7619 stars * 15 = 114285
(524 flags + 92 applauses) * 10 = 6160
114285 + 6160 = 120445
120445 / 4074 posts = 29.5643103 rounded to 30

Note that here quantity can hurt you if you don't also get stars and flags. If you had 10,000 posts here instead of 4,074, your karma score would be 12 instead of 30. If you had 2,000 posts your score would be 60. In other words, pithy posts that earn stars and/or flags are worth than toss-off posts with no value.

Note that Points don't appear to count here at all. You EARN points through getting applause, posting a single post, or by people responding to your threads, and points are SUBTRACTED when you've been a bad person and get an "Extreme Content Warning" but points by themselves don't do anything to you K or W scores. ATS may use points for other things, but we don't know what they are.It seems a bit odd that one applause can earn you 500 points, but it only counts the same as a single flag for the Karma score and not at all for the WATS score.
edit on 4/1/2012 by schuyler because: (no reason given)

posted on Apr, 1 2012 @ 08:51 PM
reply to post by schuyler

Thanks schuyler.

I wish I could give you a star for this.

I guess you'll have to settle for a Kudos



new topics

top topics


log in