Originally posted by Nathan-D
I can link you to videos too, hundreds.
I know, you did in you're reply.
Instead of lazily linking me to videos how about you explain to me, in your own words, why the science that Monckton advocates is flawed. False
commentators like yourself always give themselves away by linking people to videos, without explaining the science itself.
This is a
from you, who linked video's in your response to me.
If I were a betting man, I would say that you probably don't understand the science and just take AGW on faith. At least, that's the
impression I'm getting.
Have you considered that you may over estimate the value of you own impressions, especially as a reliable
instrument for gaging any one persons aptitude for scientific comprehension in relation to climate change.
I'll give you a minute to digest that.
You probably need two minutes.
Considering your impressions may have led you to accept Lord Monkton as an "expert" on the Science of Climate Change, I find your comment is rather
amusing, and some what encouraging. By encouraging, I mean that you do not see me as being in the same "Scientific" class as Monkton.
So, I would like to thank you for the compliment.
Oh, I've done my research. Don't worry about that.
Do I sound worried in my posts? I was trying to convey pity for you. Oh! Well.
He's never lied about his qualifications.
What is the wager again?
He testified before congress as an Expert on climate change.
So, if he is an expert on climate change, has advised on climate change, has written and lectured on climate change.
Where are the scientific papers he has written?
He has not written one science paper, ever ,on this topic.
Where are the scientific lectures he has presented based on his expertise in the field?
Why is he a policy advisor to a group he actually started. That is, he advises himself.
He testified to congress that he has written about the mathematics and physics of Climate sensitivity.
Yet has no published works.
Well actually some published the dribble he "writes". The group he started, which he advises. So he published himself, on his own advice.
Monkton, torn apart by science
That's what the AGW attack-dogs what you to think. They attack the messenger and try to smear their reputation instead of the message
I find this comment rather hypocritical, considering the majority of your posts attacks me personally, and not the issues I raise in my previous
Instead of lazily linking me to videos.....
Here you accuse me of being lazy.
False commentators like yourself....
Calling my commentary false without actually arguing any of my points.
nd you fall for it, hook, line and sinker.
Claiming I have fallen for some scam.
and you fall for it, hook, line and sinker. Of course he has qualifications, and even if he didn't, are you really such a snob as to judge
a man by his title?
So show me his qualifications. Instead of attacking me, just show me his qualifications. Wouldn't the logical thing to do, in this instance, be simply
showing why Lord Monkton is qualified in climate science.
You can't can you?
But anyway, I am no snob. I base my judgement on the material and the evidence Monkton has provided, which is incredibly poor.
I have based my opinion on the claims he has made, and that fact that they have consistently failed to transpire.
If you would like to correct that by explaining to me why no one signed Copenhagen when Monkton assured all who would listen, that it was a done deal
and the NWO were ushering in a communist state, I would appreciate that.
Until then, Monkton is wrong, again.
Well, let's hear it. Stop keeping me on tenterhooks and explain why his science is wrong.
Point out Monktons Science. He has
none, that is why he is wrong.
Just show me his research.
Published. With links to the raw data he uses.
Monkton=Claims that the NWO has manufactured AGW in order to bring about a communist world government.
And that shocks you? I would expect nothing less from the greedy banking elite.
It does not shock me at all. Once again, This is Monkton's claim, that has failed to transpire. This is evidence that the man is wrong. Again, please
explain why Monktons is not wrong when he consistently fails to see his NWO claims eventuate.
Hint: When you say something is going to happen, and it doesn't, and you have a habit of saying things are going to happen, and they don't, that
generally means you do not know what you are talking about.
Monkton is typical of the above.
Yes, and not just China, but India and Russia too.
Don't push the topic into an even bigger joke. You stated as evidence, that the Communist State of China was against Global Warming because China
claims it is a Western Scam, Yet you also accept Monkton's claim that Global Warming is a NWO plot in order to make the world into one Communist
So what is it, make your mind up dude!
You seem to pick and choose material that simply supports a belief you already have.
I prefer to review ALL the material, and then form a belief from that.
Currently, after reviewing Monkton's claims, and on witnessing his inability to validate his claims with any reality or actual event of these claims
transpiring, I find his material's useless as information worth integrating into my paradigm.
I also addressed your claims that I need to look at Agenda 21, which you have totally failed to reply to.
edit on 20/10/10 by atlasastro because: (no reason given)