Originally posted by Nathan-D
Would you be gracious enough to point out any of his misunderstandings in climate science and explain in detail exactly why he is wrong?
gracious enough to link to short videos, just to start.
Curious people like me would like to know.
If you are indeed curious, as you claim to be, do you own research. That should sate your
Also, just because you think he lacks the salient qualifications
It has nothing to do with what I think, the man has no qualifications
and has in fact lied about his qualifications.
that doesn't necessarily mean he's wrong.
I know that, so I found out for myself that he is, in fact, wrong.
I find the arguments from skeptics like Monckton more convincing, not because of his qualifications, but because he makes more sense.
Monkton=Claims that the NWO has manufactured AGW in order to bring about a communist world government.
I guess that makes total sense.
He claimed that Copenhagen would be its beginning.
Didn't happen. Monkton makes sense=Fail.
So yeah, the man makes amazing sense.
He then claimed that Obama and the senate were afraid to sign Copenhagen and push the GW agenda because "the people" had written letters and protested
to their Congressmen.
This is the same Congress and President that ignored 9 millions "pink slips" from people who said they didn't want health reform. The millions that
didn't want the bailouts in TARP. The millions that protested the Wars. Millions of people who think 9/11 is an inside job. Didn't stop them then
ignoring all those. All of sudden the NWO just stopped by a few letters. Remember, that this is not just about America, the entire world failed to
agree at Copenhagen, not just the USA.
Monkton NWO claim makes sense=Fail.
Here's a good video (www.youtube.com...) of Monckton talking to an environmentalist, he even tells her not to believe
anything he says and encourages her to do her own research, as opposed to the generally dogmatic stuff you often get from the alarmists
authoritatively telling us that the "science is settled", or the "time for debate is over", or my personal favourite, "we must act now before it is
too late!" Polar bears are dying en masse!", obviously to try and evoke an emotional response out of people and vitiate their objectivity.
Yeah, Monkton doesn't go for the emotional stuff in order to evade objectivity, does he?
After all, he just claims that THE ENTIRE WORLD WILL BECOME A COMMUNIST ONE WORLD STATE.
I have researched what he says.
What he claims is rubbish.
I don't see many believers trying to claim that AGW is a NWO plot.
This quote of mine was related to those that accept Global Warming.
You have totally misunderstood my post.
He certainly isn't the only one,
I know. I am familiar with the many Skeptics.
a sate-sanctioned book in China
A state sanctioned book by China. OMG, OMG, OMG, a state sanctioned book by China.
Are you serious! On one had you accept that Monkton makes sense in his claims that the NWO is trying to bring in a Communist World State.
And now you tell me that the Peoples Republic of China, A COMMUNIST state, is critical of global warming.
recently said that AGW is "a conspiracy between Western governments and business to protect their own way of life, at the expense of the entire
developing world — in other words, 80% of the world's population".
Make your mind up dude!
Is global warming a NWO conspiracy in order to bring about a one world communist state.
Or do you believe a communist state, like China, that claims it is a western conspiracy.
Do some research into it first before brushing it off as nonsense.
I have. AND it is pure nonsense.
You might want to start with Agenda 21.
Read it for yourself.
If you read section 9. Concerning the Atmosphere, its recommendations and suggestions for Government action for each member that signed the treaty in
Rio in 92' you will note that these suggestions and changes have not been even remotely implemented.
In fact, for each section, go through all the environmental areas, and look at all the suggestions and recommendations. Then research the action taken
for YOUR country.
See how many your country has actually made or even attempted.
9.12. Governments at the appropriate level, with the cooperation of the relevant United Nations bodies
and, as appropriate, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, and the private sector,
a. Cooperate in identifying and developing economically viable, environmentally sound energy
sources to promote the availability of increased energy supplies to support sustainable
development efforts, in particular in developing countries;
Almost twenty years later.
We can see how well that has worked. China is building more Coal Fire Power Plants than ever before in History.
c. Promote the research, development, transfer and use of improved energy-efficient
technologies and practices, including endogenous technologies in all relevant sectors, giving
special attention to the rehabilitation and modernization of power systems, with particular
attention to developing countries;
In my country, and in particular my state, we stalled in promoting policy on Climate Change in order to generate a tax base to invest in more modern,
efficient and sustainable power supply. This resulted in a stagnation in response and action to our current out dated power production and
infrastructure which has seen costs rise nearly 35% anyway, making counter arguments relating to tax increases on carbon emissions tax redundant as
cost have increased anyway.
k. Encourage education and awareness-raising programmes at the local, national, subregional
and regional levels concerning energy efficiency and environmentally sound energy systems;
l. Establish or enhance, as appropriate, in cooperation with the private sector, labelling
programmes for products to provide decision makers and consumers with information on
opportunities for energy efficiency.
We also failed to address the trends in power use. Research found that people will still try and maintain habits of use, absorbing power costs
regardless of income status, until it starts creating an increase in economic stress in average household. We are seeing this now in larger
percentages in my state now that the costs have increased.
I could uses every section of Agenda 21 and show how Governments around the world have largely ignored the recommendations made within.
I could do the same with Kyoto, which has given China and India( two of the largest emitters) a free pass until 2012.
So much for the NWO.
Your post+Monkton+Agenda 21 = Epic Fail.
edit on 19/10/10 by atlasastro because: (no reason given)