NASA 'intrusions' may deter rocket scientists (interesting), page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 15-10-2010 @ 08:28 AM by anon72

Forget rocket science, space researchers are at the heart of an extraordinary legal battle over privacy. The case will help to clarify whether the US federal government can legally perform extensive background checks on employees doing non-classified work. It could also affect NASA's ability to attract top scientists.


In 2005, Robert Nelson, a planetary scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, led a group of 28 colleagues in objecting to background checks introduced by JPL as part of efforts to beef up homeland security.
The group sued, claiming that the checks were "intrusive" because they gave NASA permission to collect information – such as a person's medical history and sexual habits – which was unnecessary for workers at the laboratory, who use satellites and robotic spacecraft to explore the solar system. "They wanted to know who we slept with," says Nelson. "We thought that was off-limits, out of bounds."

Source:
www.newscientist.com...

I hope you read the source story. It goes on to what NASA's defense claim was in the lawsuit and the counter-claims-All I find very interesting, in light of the recent Don't Ask Don't Tell battle going on. And, of course, general privacy arguments overall.

So, where does your privacy stop/start when working for the Feds (or any gov't agency)? Personally, I think getting into ones sexual conduct (now-a-days) is going to far. I can't believe I am writing that but, things change-including me.

If something were to come down to two equal canidates (in every way) etc. I don't want the deciding factor to be who the person is sleeping/having sex with. If we don't make being gay a big deal (like it has been/is with the Feds) then it takes the whole argument away about homosexuality being used as a blackmail weapons (or the alike).

What's your thoughts? Can't wait to see/read.

PS: I think the whole "they could get close to the shuttle with their clearences....." is a total joke. I am sure one or two homosexuals (in the closet of course) that have been on missions. I am sure that will be a story once the whole D.A.D.T battle is done with. What is NASA thinking? If they are gay, they have more of an opportuinty to do something bad/harmful?


reply posted on 15-10-2010 @ 09:26 AM by rogerstigers
reply to post by anon72



Hmm.. a bit confused here.. Isn't the shuttle fleet retired? Why would the NASA admins be worried about that? But the excuse is rather flimsy, anyway.

The article goes on to say,
"You're going to lose folks," says plaintiff Dennis Byrnes, a JPL engineer. Nelson agrees: "NASA will be losing top-notch scientific talent. They'll just choose to work somewhere else."


I agree. This could be a HUGE boon for the private space industry. Alienate all of your employees and you won't have any anymore -- your competition will.


reply posted on 15-10-2010 @ 05:39 PM by anon72
reply to post by sy.gunson



Interesting reply. Where any of these folks homosexual/gay etc> Or are you saying that there are others with worse things than worring about their sexual prefences.


reply posted on 15-10-2010 @ 05:58 PM by Xcathdra
reply to post by anon72



I wonder if this has anything to do with the Astronaut love triangle from a few years ago. The one female astronaut had some plan for another astronaut, something about diapers, stalking etc.

She was sent to jail if i remember right. Kind of embarrassing for NASA... Then again maybe not if people don't remember it.

Something about Yes, I work for NASA, on Top Secret projects, I like long walks under the moon, and getting bonked while being choked with Alien space porn in the background.


I have seen some articles talking about China still doing there industrial / technological espionage game, and they have announced a manned mission to the moon. So that might have something to do with it also.
edit on 15-10-2010 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^