It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The term "shovel-ready"—as in, infrastructure projects that are ready or almost ready to begin—has become a favorite of policy makers in recent weeks. As the Senate gets ready to vote on a stimulus bill, it looks like the idea has stuck: The latest bill gives only projects that are able to start construction within 90 days eligibility for funding from the $90 billion set aside for infrastructure. Here is why the shovel-ready mandate could make the infrastructure crisis worse.
The term arrived with all the muscle and blue-collar authority of a bulldozer: "shovel-ready." As in, infrastructure projects that are ready or almost ready to begin, the antithesis of some dimly imagined earmark or budget-sucking bridge to nowhere. Then-president-elect Obama used the term on a December 7th visit to NBC's Meet the Press, describing the kinds of projects that would be supported by the upcoming economic stimulus bill. Soon the phrase was being repeated by policy-makers only an almost daily basis. Now the bill is here, with one version passed by the House, and another being debated by the Senate. "Shovel-ready" isn't language used in the bill, but the House's version, at least, does have an enforceable short-term focus: Only projects that are able to start construction within 90 days of selection are eligible for funding from the $90 billion set aside for infrastructure.
When the president campaigned for the stimulus package at the start of his presidency, he and others in his administration repeatedly insisted the investments would go to "shovel-ready" projects -- projects that would put people to work right away.
With unemployment hovering near 10 percent nearly two years after President Obama signed his economic stimulus package, Mr. Obama is acknowledging that, despite his campaign promises, "there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects."
"There's going to be a lot of work in this administration just doing things right and making sure that new laws are stood up in the ways they're intended."
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by neo96
Well 47% of the US does get paid for it. Unfortunately the other 53% pay for it.
Second line
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by Target Earth
Very sad state of affairs we are in isn't it.
So what can we do about it?
I really can not see him winning another term right now but like you said, you never know.
A couple of more entitlement programs, amnesty for the illegal aliens and we are sunk, he won't have just one term, he will be EMPOROR.
So very sad.
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by Target Earth
Very sad state of affairs we are in isn't it.
So what can we do about it?
I really can not see him winning another term right now but like you said, you never know.
A couple of more entitlement programs, amnesty for the illegal aliens and we are sunk, he won't have just one term, he will be EMPOROR.
So very sad.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
No offense to the OP but this is just a Republican talking point the Republicans have been talking about all day. I agree that government wastes money.....but this is just a thread to vent, not to provide concrete facts to show any valid point.
In other words, show me the money!
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
No offense to the OP but this is just a Republican talking point the Republicans have been talking about all day. I agree that government wastes money.....but this is just a thread to vent, not to provide concrete facts to show any valid point.
In other words, show me the money!
Originally posted by wutone
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
No offense to the OP but this is just a Republican talking point the Republicans have been talking about all day. I agree that government wastes money.....but this is just a thread to vent, not to provide concrete facts to show any valid point.
In other words, show me the money!
Um the big justification for the stimulus was to provide "shovel ready" jobs. For the last year or so, the democrats have been badgering about "shovel ready" jobs being created.. Now there is no such thing according to Obama?
This is not just the normal government waste, this is a near trillion dollar con on the American people. A trillion dollars and not only does the "shovel ready" jobs not exist, but the trillion dollars did not create any jobs at all. Maybe the stimulus saved some government union jobs and propped up some government pensions, but that is a far cry from creating "shovel ready" jobs.