Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Video Proof The Sea Floor Moved....Discussion of Explosions in the Gulf...Is BP Causing Them?

page: 5
45
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 07:10 PM
link   
Just check this out at 15 seconds and you will see a really big chunk






posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 07:16 PM
link   
Another video of the sea floor with lots of holes and "fire rain"....at 3:57, there is an odd formation




posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 07:29 PM
link   
Watch the last few minutes of this....the floor looks to be pulsating and lots of red chunks spewing




posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 07:49 PM
link   
Fast forward to 45 seconds and watch till the end





posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 07:58 PM
link   
WOW....at 1:00 start watching for a dark red chunk....then at 3:57 you can see a reddish glow on the right side of the screen again....MOST INTERESTING is the piece of rock they zoom in on at beginning at 1:21.....it looks like a chunk of rock, but when they zoom in and study it, you can se it looks like a chunk of lava....with the center glowing red....





posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 08:01 PM
link   
i wish that there could just be a forced way of making BP tell us once and for all what is going on...but really...how can we hold much sway on a corporation that isn't even american...



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 08:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Ektar
 


Great pics as usual!!!!



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 09:26 PM
link   
Here's a video from 9 Aug...sorry it's a little long but does show
eruptions & coordinates are clear...



Ektar



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 09:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by StealthyKat
BK.....I FINALLY found the video that I wanted you to see so bad....this shows the sea floor, and it is MESSED UP! ....you can see unusual formations, crevices, what looks like chunks of WHITE CEMENT.... then it looks at one point that the rocks on the sea floor have a reddish tinge to them, then shortly after that, those reddish orange chunks (like the chunk in the pic above) start raining down....I would REALLY love to hear what you have to say about this one.
edit on 15-10-2010 by StealthyKat because: (no reason given)


This video has some STRANGE things in it...around 5:29 the things coming down like rain appear to be
cylinders of some sort & most of the time they are in pairs.

Ektar



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 11:02 PM
link   
Here are some photos from 5 Sept that show what appear to be cylinders coming down...
BK Lim any ideas what these may be?





Here's a photo series of a Blow on 3 Sept 2:38am EST has coordinates
















Ektar



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 12:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by BK Lim
reply to post by Rich Z
 


Rich Z, I also asked that question initially. I found the answers and that’s why I am posting on the internet to let the rest know or to confirm their suspicion.

BP had no choice but to provide information under the Freedom of Information Act, pressed by Congress and public. Say if BP were to refuse giving out any video feed and operate in the dark, there would have been more backlashes. Given the choice, I would provide the information, albeit distorted ones. “The most dangerous of all falsehoods is a slightly distorted truth” – Lichtenberg.


That would sound impressive, except for the fact that the Freedom of Information Act only applies to the government, and not to any private party nor industry. The FOIA cannot compel any private individual or business to provide ANYTHING.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 12:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by StealthyKat
reply to post by Rich Z
 


BP was ORDERED to provide the live feeds by the government. They didn't want to do it, and wouldn't do it voluntarily, so finally they were forced to by law. They fought it all the way. Once they got them up, the feeds were crystal clear, and you could see every detail, until they realized how many people were watching and recording.... then they tried everything to make it difficult to see what was going on. They used color filters, they did heavy pixelation, and many times cut the feeds off completely when something happened. So, to answer your question, they did not do this willingly at all. BTW, I was one who thought people were exaggerating....until I started watching the feeds and videos just about every day. The things I saw made me change my mind about that.



Are we talking about the same BP that was ORDERED to cease and desist with the spraying of Corexit into the Gulf of Mexico?



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 12:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Rich Z

Are we talking about the same BP that was ORDERED to cease and desist with the spraying of Corexit into the Gulf of Mexico?


Correct me if I'm wrong, but they weren't ordered to stop spraying Corexit. The EPA strongly encouraged them to stop, but had no power to order them to do anything.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 12:25 AM
link   
Check this out...

Tilting? Wellhead becomes covered in clouds — ROV turns away and cuts feed (VIDEO)
October 15th, 2010 at 09:08 AM



Source www.floridaoilspilllaw.com...

Ektar



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 04:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Ektar
 


Ektar, you notice the "black" exposed electrodes regularly spaced on the wires? It looks like the sparker electrodes we use in our seismic surveys. When discharged at > 5000 Volts, it will spark and cause an explosion. With all that methane around, no wonder you guys are so right about the recorded series of explosions. Am still looking thru the videos. So much to digest, will need time to digest. Please excuse me if I do not answer promptly.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 05:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Rich Z
 


Rich Z, you are right the FOIA cannot compel the private companies to reveal anything. But how would it look when the Obama Admin claims to be in-charge from day 1 and BP (supposedly working under them) refused to yield? I also quoted "public pressure" - this is a significant factor especially if the problems are expected to last at least 3 months. They had hoped to win the public over with their "magic show" and the ROV videos with BP schills planted at various technical sites were aimed at just doing that.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 05:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Ektar
 


Ektar - you made very good observations. If they are exploding the methane concentrated water using the "sparker electrode wires" above seabed (10 to 30 ft asb), besides the main explosion you also get numerous smaller "explosion being ignited" like the fireworks. These smaller explosions would be travelling either horizontally, raining downwards or vertically upwards depending on the where the ROV camera was recording from. The "cylinders or pairs" you see would be distorted (slower frame-per second speed of recording) due to unburnt-methane bubble with a short tail of exploded tail. Does that make sense?



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 05:49 AM
link   
reply to post by StealthyKat
 


StealthyKat, the faulted (and possibly lava beds) were formed millions of years ago. For lava to be extruded from a volcano, there has to be an eruption (either violent or the less violent continuous flow type). At the moment I have not seen any seismic data/ sections or heard of reported seismic activities to suggest active volcanic activities. The exposed rock outcrops is the first I have seen and it does make geological sense now what is happening here. But for hot lava volcanic activities (real magma lava), I think the USGS would have been alerting us already (hope I am right on this). But the seismic geophone (seismic reader you called it) evidence is intriguing. If BP is planting "seabed geophones" on the seabed, then I would really think we are in very serious trouble for BP to be monitoring for seismic activities here. From what I had read, the Gulf is supposed to be dormant and not tectonically active. I am not saying it isn't since we cannot be sure from the blurred picture or it could be just a piece or part of the "grouting equipment" left in place.

But you are right on the "red hot burning" blobs on the seabed and one or two flying around. Instead of "burning lava" I would like to suggest "burning tar balls" or chunks of asphalts that had been flung into the water column, got heated up by the explosion or burning methane and started burning itself.

Then it starts to make sense of all these "new observations" I had been seeing for the first time. Thanks to all of you. Like I said before if we look at things in isolation, we are more likely to "mis-interpret". We need a geological framework to correctly bind all the small pieces of this big BP disaster jigsaw puzzle. BP is definitely not helping with all these lies and deception.

edit on 16-10-2010 by BK Lim because: Added comments.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 06:28 AM
link   
reply to post by Rich Z
 


Yes, we are talking about the same BP. But they can spray corexit under the radar, as they have been lately, at night etc....all they can do to hide the feeds is what they have been doing....altering the view with pixelation and filters. The live feeds were being monitored by a lot of different agencies, so they HAD to have them up....they just made them hard to see.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 06:35 AM
link   
reply to post by Ektar
 


Yep.....this is FAR from over....remember the other day I posted the pic of the "bullseye" way off center? That's when I first noticed the leaning....but it looks worse now. Good find Ektar! And this was yesterday....

Yep....BP's gonna "Make this right"





new topics

top topics



 
45
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join