It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Seapeople
Ok, lets be totally honest here. I am not taking sides. I think that trying to compare history to the bible in this way is meaningless. The New Testament is an account of the beginning of Christianity. It is the account of one man. It is an account of the life of Jesus. Comparing outside sources to this is not only meanigless, but foolish. It is a religious text describing a religion. If you don't believe it, thats fine. It describes exactly what is supposed to have happened to Jesus. The things you speak of describe something else. Something that has no bearing on the New Testament and its message that Jesus Christ Lived.
Now, on the other hand. It is not historical fact that a man by the name of Jesus was crucified. Even if it was, that man may not have been the same Jesus. Trying to claim this story as "historical fact" is also meaningless and foolish. The truth is that you need to have faith. You need to believe in the story. I can assure you that in your lifetime, we will not be able to say that the New testiment is historical fact.....
Who was crucified?
Originally posted by infovacume
Originally posted by Seapeople
Ok, lets be totally honest here. I am not taking sides. I think that trying to compare history to the bible in this way is meaningless. The New Testament is an account of the beginning of Christianity. It is the account of one man. It is an account of the life of Jesus. Comparing outside sources to this is not only meanigless, but foolish. It is a religious text describing a religion. If you don't believe it, thats fine. It describes exactly what is supposed to have happened to Jesus. The things you speak of describe something else. Something that has no bearing on the New Testament and its message that Jesus Christ Lived.
Now, on the other hand. It is not historical fact that a man by the name of Jesus was crucified. Even if it was, that man may not have been the same Jesus. Trying to claim this story as "historical fact" is also meaningless and foolish. The truth is that you need to have faith. You need to believe in the story. I can assure you that in your lifetime, we will not be able to say that the New testiment is historical fact.....
WTF ARE YOU TALKING about, lol I don't care what you believe, that is your opinion, I was not arguing about that, I was simply saying that there were many scholars and historians during that time the recorded that a man named Jesus, did many wonderful acts, he said he was the san of god, and the the Romans killed him on the cross, that is all I am saying, Look it up if you dont believe me. Oh yeah I am a christian, I do believe the Bible, that is not what I was saying, maybe we got confused, also I was not trying to say the new testiment was a fact, as that would get me flamed, and I dont have time to argue. Iw as saying through outside sources at the time, it was recorded, a lot of poeple dont know that.
[Edited on 1-7-2004 by infovacume]
With the �sky� literally falling down all around them, a handful of Jewish men joined forces and fashioned a plan to salvage the legacy of �Abraham, Isaac and Jacob,� in a form other than Judaism hoping to preserve it (everything Jewish was being destroyed). These Christian forefathers saw the writing on the wall, and understood that Judaism may have breathed its final gasp and gave these words to be spoke by their new symbol Jesus, who in his dieing breath said, �Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? That is, �My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?� (Matthew 27:46).
Originally posted by masqua
Interestingly, I have recently finished reading Tom Harpurs book, The Pagan Christ, and have just completed the first three chapters of Knight and Lomas' The Book of Hiram. In both these theological attempts at connecting the ancient with the contemperary, there has been much made of crucifictions.
......
Knight and Lomas mention the self imposed crucifiction of Odin in the Nordic tradition, hanging nailed to a tree for nine days, sporting a spear wound in his side and resurrecting himself after eight days.