SOHO Catches A UFO ?

reply to post by GezinhoKiko

You are thinking of the STEREO satellites.
There is one SOHO satellite.

reply to post by srbouska
it is on the soho web site lower left corner look for uk link lasco3 pick current sun activity.

reply to post by Subjective1

Have you shown your astronomer friend the explanation offered by the scientist who Pauligirl contacted?
Does he have problems with that explanation? If so, can you summarize them?

So, now we have four different images of what appears to be exactly the same object at four different times, four different angles and taken with the LASCO C2 and LASCO C3 imagers.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/474d9ef19e4a.jpg[/atsimg]

Originally posted by heineken
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/99995eec864c.jpg[/atsimg]

I don't see how this can be a random glitch that has been duplicated identically. Also, the exhaust type tail appears to suggest the object is moving at considerable speed.
The question is, what is it thats flying around out there?

reply to post by subby


Wow, well done.. i was hoping to see them all in one post..
any way we can figure out the speed roughly?
And now since its seen in different times... do they show up in the SAME spot exactly or different spots?

reply to post by subby


Its not a random glitch, but a known and explained effect, that occurs under certain conditions. The reason it looks similar is because the conditions were similar. Just ask yourself, why is the phenomena oriented in a horizontal direction on all images?

reply to post by -PLB-


I find it hard to believe that "an image artifact caused by a very energetic cosmic ray striking the sensor" would be so exactly recreated four times within such a short space of time.
This object is so specific in it's shape and dimensions, how could that exact artifact be created by four seperate cosmic rays?

reply to post by subby


I think it would be useful to find this phenomenon that doesnt show a ship like disturbance.. like do we have one that occured that looked like an apple or you know what i mean? something of a differnet shape. THEN I would believe it may not be a ship.

reply to post by Phage


ah yes
my mistake
dont they take images from the sun?

The boyo on the extreme left seems to be scarpering away...that doesn't make sense

reply to post by srbouska


No "disturbance". Different shape.


But you aren't going to find an apple because the shape is determined by the characteristics of the sensor. The shape will always be somewhat similar.

Originally posted by ZELDAR
Totally fake, here is the link to the real picture. sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov...

You can also find it on the SOHO website.

It's not the same picture
The one in the op was taken at 2010/10/10 12:12 and your picture was photographed at 2010/10/12 19:24
A photograph two days later can't prove that the previous one is fake (...and from the same official SOHO/NASA website).

FYI, SOHO takes photographes all the time at a regular basis...

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by srbouska

 

No "disturbance". Different shape.


But you aren't going to find an apple because the shape is determined by the characteristics of the sensor. The shape will always be somewhat similar.

edit on 10/12/2010 by Phage because: (no reason given)

What's an eagle doing in space?






ETA: Whoa look at Phage's "edit on" date! Creepy! He edited his post on the 10th of December of 2010!!!!

reply to post by iSeeKEnlightenment8o5

Whoa...so did you.

That would be, in the American format, 10/12/2010.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by iSeeKEnlightenment8o5

 

Whoa...so did you.

That would be, in the American format, 10/12/2010.

edit on 10/12/2010 by Phage because: (no reason given)

I don't believe this. Just trying to be funny over here and I get this...I feel hurt.

Originally posted by subby
So, now we have four different images of what appears to be exactly the same object at four different times, four different angles and taken with the LASCO C2 and LASCO C3 imagers.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/474d9ef19e4a.jpg[/atsimg]

Originally posted by heineken
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/99995eec864c.jpg[/atsimg]

I don't see how this can be a random glitch that has been duplicated identically. Also, the exhaust type tail appears to suggest the object is moving at considerable speed.
The question is, what is it thats flying around out there?

Its Concord. That's where they went. Adapted for space travel and replacing the shuttle. All makes sense. Funded by the trillions that went missing too perhaps. Who knows but that's my take. Concord. This will open up a whole new thread NASA+Concord=? (Could be anything)

pretty much an artifact.

Originally posted by iSeeKEnlightenment8o5

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by iSeeKEnlightenment8o5

 

Whoa...so did you.

That would be, in the American format, 10/12/2010.

edit on 10/12/2010 by Phage because: (no reason given)

I don't believe this. Just trying to be funny over here and I get this...I feel hurt.

Hi Iseek,
Your edit shows 12/10/2010 to me. Phage's shows 10/12/2010

Just wondering out loud:
If it/these were glitches from a fixed camera (I take it is fixed?)- at least as much as it can be floating around in space, why is the "trail" coming from the object shown in 10/10/ 17:48 coming out of the same point as the other objects shown (the pointy bit). Yet this one clearly appears to have changed direction. Does that make sense? Doesn't to me.
I'm not trying to argue with anyone in particular- anyone at all! I just don't see the bloom theory. They should all have exactly the same- oh, i don't know how to put it: vanishing point (?) shouldn't they?

I am so glad that someone found the wood paddle bit I lost the other day