posted on Oct, 9 2010 @ 03:20 AM
reply to post by KIZZZY
Here is a couple problems with I have so far with this fella. According to the author of this YouTube video, a background check was done on Ed Fouche
and there was nobody with first last name of Ed Fouche, also with the middle name of Rothschild. The author then suggests that Ed used the Rothschild
name to alter his own middle name in an effort to hide his identity. I muist say that it would be a dumb move if you are trying to hide your identity.
I think you would change anything but your middle name.
Now I know that you pasted the statement apparently from Ed about the name Rothschild, but if he was willing to lie for the sale of books, then what
else would he be willing to lie for?
Furthermore, I have only gotten past the first few minutes of the video and already I'm seeing red flags go up. This guy apparently worked at Groom
Lake on classified projects, yet is standing up giving presentations on those projects. He even admits that he will be discussing these classified
projects. Well, that is against the law and if he worled on classified projects as a civillian, then he undoubtedly signed a plethora of documents
promissing to keep his mouth shut on those projects. For military serivce members, it is against the law period, though I'm not too sure about the
differences in law between a civillian and service member for classified information. If what he us saying is accurate, then TPTB or the company or
government that he worked for, would surely silence him through legal means. In other words, he would not be allowed to give public presentations
before live audiences and write and publish books on his knowledge.
Past that, I have not watched the video and so can't comment. I'm not saying that the guy is lying, only that there are some serious red flags going
up, and only in the first few minutes of his presentation.
On a side note, anyone who would get married within 28 days and to that woman
, may have some mental or stability issues that may need to be
edit on 9-10-2010 by airspoon because: (no reason given)