reply to post by TrueAmerican
They had better be able to substantiate the allegations of child neglect and abuse, because they had to have that in order to take the child. In some
states the mere allegation of either/or can give just cause to remove minors from any home pending an investigation. So anyone for any reason could
have reported abuse (real or not) to initiate the removal of this baby from its parents. Sometimes these investigations can drag on for many
months....
There are a lot of unanswered questions here, and it all is really starting to smell.
The fact that they would even mention the ties to oath keepers and a purchase of weapons is very unusual, I'd really like to see that document.
It isn't beyond the realm of possibility that some of the allegations will be proven false, but the state will keep custody because of the weapons,
and ties to a militia.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
In the end, the odds are always on the side of the government, and they will usually make a case, even if they need to fabricate one, including
evidence, especially when it gets this much public attention. And of course expect their very best public relations people to soon spin this in the
media and to completely demonize these parents and the oath keepers at any and every opportunity to do so.
edit on 7-10-2010 by Fractured.Facade because: (no reason given)
Doesn't mean it's true. And they can call John Irish whatever they want. But doesn't mean that's true
either.
