Did anyone look up the facebook page mentioned in the video? After scrolling to the bottom of the results page their was a link to their story under "web results" that linked to North East White Pride. Just curious,as to what Oathkeepers has to do with white supremacy. I am an Oathkeeper and "We find these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal". That said, I believe it a terrible thing that the TPTB would prey on maternity wards to further their intrusion into the lives of private citizens.

Originally posted by Kailassa

Originally posted by ericsnow
When the mother and father were given visitation due to public pressure, and the baby arrived she was lethargic... they decided to change the baby's diaper since that will usually rouse the child... when the diaper came off their was blood all over her vaginal area.

"they decided to change the baby's diaper since that will usually rouse the child" ....
I've had 3 kids of my own and cared for dozens more, and I can tell you you don't change a nappy to rouse a child.
That's a really weird statement to make, so weird it reads like an excuse for changing it.
If they had to make up an excuse to change it, what was the real reason?
It can't have needed changing or they would have said that.

When my daughter was an infant, and I would change her diaper, she would cry and fuss about it. She could be sleeping and get upset over having her diaper changed. So yes, it is possible to rouse a child by changing the diaper.

Originally posted by justadood
so,the newest meme being perpetuated by the Alex Jones bots is they had 'the wrong john irish'

i have seen no actual evidence to confirm this.

anyone?

(Oh, and a quote from alex jones isnt evidence.

Someone on this thread already discovered a small mixup with the father's name.

The father is a member of "Sons of Liberty Riders" which is much more radical than Oathkeepers. SOLR are technically still not a militia, but they are quite a bit more aggressive than OK. SOLR lists a John Irish as a member, and on his page (which I linked to earlier) there are comments and good wishes for the situation, so it appeared to be the same John Irish.

Someone on ATS pointed out that the age was wrong. He claims to have been a rider for 35 years, so he can't be the same John Irish, and it turns out he is the father of John Irish.

That has nothing to do with the assault and violence charges leveled against Taylor's boyfriend, our John Irish. Those charges are a direct result of her kids being hit and the neighbors calling the police, and Taylor herself calling the police when he "choked and hit" her.

There is another confusing character. Taylors "husband." John Irish is not her husband, but he is the father of this latest baby. Taylor is still married to the father of the other two children that have been taken away from her. The husband is has refused to sign divorce papers for the past 2 years, so they are technically still married, even though she lives with Irish.

Hope that helps.

i have to say, the way CPS backed off of this only seems to affirm the theory that it was a foolish error to include the Oath Keepers in the affidavit.

This case would have stuck if they hadn't included that reference, i bet.

It would be interesting to find out if the person who decided to include the Oath Keepers in the affidavit still has a job...
---