posted on Oct, 6 2010 @ 05:38 PM
"Yes I believe the eye witness testimony that there were explosions going off, but I question that these explosions were done to bring the building
down. They may have served another purpose. Usually in a CD you hear the explosion and the building collapses within seconds this did not happen with
the WTC. Perhaps they were meant to stop firefighters from putting out the fires for obvious reasons."
Good point. In all likelihood, the purpose of these secondary explosions were not only to prevent firefighters from reaching the fires and putting
them out, their purpose was also to prevent them from witnessing and reporting on what they saw once they reached the point of impact. In an effort to
attempt to disguise these secondary explosions, they set them off as close to the second Tower's impact as possible. Obviously, they screwed up by
not timing them at exactly the same time of the second impact.
"If you are referring to people like John Farmer, senior counsel to the 911 Commission, who feels that not everyone who gave evidence to the
Commission was telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth I would agree. There must be a large number of officials who felt " ffs, why did
this have to happen on my watch ?". Inevitably there has been back covering and I think John Farmer understands that. I think it is incredible that
there could be so many conspirators, at so many levels, out there and no-one has breathed a word."
So, on the one hand you believe the officials were not being truthful and covering their rear ends during the 911 Commission investigation and on the
other hand you expect someone involved in the attacks to admit to their involvement because of a guilty conscience. Contradict yourself much?
"I'm sorry but I don't believe anyone in the US is in danger of being murdered because they speak out about 9/11."
When they're not being murdered, a treasonous and disreputable media ignores and ridicules the witnesses so they could cover their own rear ends and
hide their obvious involvement in 9/11?
"I don't believe David Kelly was murdered. He was a backroom boy who was a bit incautious about what he said and found himself in the frontline of a
political storm. He was not emotionally or physically equipped to deal with this and I have no doubt he killed himself."
And I have no doubt that some people have nothing better to do than push the official BS propaganda constantly being fed to the brain dead public.
"So, the government's dastardly plan to create a false terrorist attack and then hide all the evidence was foiled be...a FOIA request?"
Actually, the real question you should be asking is WHY did it take a Freedom of Information Request to release this video?
"Typical truther diversion"
So what you're saying is that all these people from all walks of life think exactly the same. Generalize and paint people with the same giant brush
much? Typical thing to do when the witness testimony and facts make one look like a moron.