It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Black_Fox
Originally posted by monkeySEEmonkeyDO
Didn't a B-52 crash into the Empire State Building back in 1945?!
Last time i checked, that building is still standing.. Hmmmmm
Plane Hits Empire State Building
Yeah the pile of rubble had to go somewhere, that fine, but you cant tell me after watching that video the building doesn't come straight down at all four corners of the building from asymmetrical damage? This is not physically possible! Mind you, this was so obvious that the 911 commission tried to just ignore it and leave it out of their report.
Originally posted by sweet6b9
Indeed this may all be true, 9/11 was planned by our Secret Government, the proof is all over the internet with the video of what hit the Pentagon, Use your brain, there is no evidence of wings hitting the Pentagon and the video is of a missile with Plasma shielding
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by PonyoSon
Yeah the pile of rubble had to go somewhere, that fine, but you cant tell me after watching that video the building doesn't come straight down at all four corners of the building from asymmetrical damage? This is not physically possible! Mind you, this was so obvious that the 911 commission tried to just ignore it and leave it out of their report.
Typical truther diversion - reason 911 Commision did not mention WTC 7 was because not germane to their
mission which was to investigate intelligence failures in how bunch of terrorists coul;d infiltrate the country and live here and take flight training without anyone noticing. WTC 7 was collateral damage.
Note nobody ever complains about WTC 3 - Marriott Hotel where 40 people died
WTC was slammed by 110 story building falling on it and slashing open South facade, starting numerous fires
Fires were spotted on 13 floors of the building which burned out of control fror 7 hours
Evidence that stands on its own to prove an alleged fact, such as testimony of a witness who says she saw a defendant pointing a gun at a victim during a robbery. Direct proof of a fact, such as testimony by a witness about what that witness personally saw or heard or did.
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by PonyoSon
Why is it that every time any conspiracy theorist talks about WTC 7 they forget about the damage from the debris! It's ridiculous. And whenever the debris is mentioned, they say "oh, but NIST said the debris isn't what caused the collapse." But I thought you didn't believe NIST! Besides, NIST came to the conclusion that the only reason the building collapsed the way it did was a result of the fires, lack of water, AND the damage. Combination effect.
Originally posted by ExPostFacto
reply to post by Come Clean
Maybe they should read the rules of evidence for our court system. Eye Witness testimony is Direct evidence:
Evidence that stands on its own to prove an alleged fact, such as testimony of a witness who says she saw a defendant pointing a gun at a victim during a robbery. Direct proof of a fact, such as testimony by a witness about what that witness personally saw or heard or did.
Direct evidence is believable to prove anything unless equally compelling direct evidence is offered. If 9/11 was ever tried in court, the government would be convicted. But apparently our government does not believe in holding themselves accountable to the legal standards they place on us.