(CNN) – Some called a Barack Obama-Hillary Clinton pairing the "Dream Ticket" in 2008. It didn't happen.
But what about 2012?
"It's on the table," veteran Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward told CNN's John King in an interview for John King, USA to air Tuesday at 7
p.m. ET. "Some of Hillary Clinton's advisers see it as a real possibility in 2012."
The scenario – whereby Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would switch positions - has been bandied about by political
observers for months, seen by some as a potentially savvy strategy to gin up excitement among what appears to be a depressed Democratic base.
But it's never been clear if the idea has been actually discussed in the White House, until now.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story. Source:
politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...
Could you think of anything worse for our country right now? Well, yes I can but this ranks right up there. It's amazing to me how the news can
publicly admit that our administration will try to garner votes based on superficial criteria, instead of the issues that actually matter, yet still
claim that these politicians are honest and look out for the best interests on the American public. What's even more scary is that it works.
Women will vote for Hillary, simply because she is a women and many liberals (both men and women) will do the same. On the other hand, many blacks and
minorities will vote for Obama, simply due to his skin-color, though the media will only condemn those who they believe won't vote for these
politicians based on the same criteria.
With that being said, I have learned over the years that it really doesn;t matter who is in office, as whoever makes it will be just as corrupt as
whoever they follow into the White House. Want to vote Obama out of office? Why, he is just going to be replaced by someone who is fighting for the
same goals (though maybe through a different vehicle) and those goals surely don't include any benefit to us. So, we vote Obama out and get someone
else in who will just carry on the same corrupt agenda. Doesn't really look apetizing to me.
In fact, we go through this cycle every 4-8 years, where we trade Republicans for Democrats and why each party dazzles us with relatively unimportant,
cosmetic issues, while pushing forward with their same statist, corporatist and authoritarian nanny-state approach. They all pander to the corporate
and special interest elite, at the expense of the peasant class, while keeping the peasants distracted and divided.
Neither one of the parties or leading candidates ever want to tackle the real problems like the uncontrolled spending, huge deficits and debt, a
marginalized Constitution and our fleeting liberties. None of them want to focus on the real problems behind our faulty economy, and instead they make
it worse by ensuring that the people eat the cost of it in the first place.
The point here, is that while an Obama-Clinton ticket seems horrifying, does it really matter anymore? If Hillary and Berry aren't elected to the
White House in 2012, it will be someone else that would push the same fundamental agenda anyway. The falling scraps might be a little different, but
they are still falling scraps and those scraps are still rotten.
The one thing that I do think about, is who will be more compitent at screwing the American people. Will Hillary as Vice-President or even President
speed up the process a little, whereby the American people get screwed faster? Is she capable of robbing us more efficiently and pushing the
anti-liberty agenda a little faster than maybe some others? Sure, I believe that may be the case, though I'll leave that variable blank.
--airspoon