It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

why arent any chief justices president?

page: 1

log in


posted on Oct, 5 2010 @ 10:04 AM
you would figure that these wise profound thinkers that make the most intelligent decisions for our country would step up to the plate and work diligently to help create the best America it could possibly be.

is it that they feel they're doing more for the country by sitting on the bench?

why isn't the congress and senate made up of these geniuses? instead of a bunch of money grubbing citizens that are only there to suck tax payers dollars, write books, cut deals with thieves, then lobby these thieves after they get their shoe in?

what chief justice currently sitting would you vote for president, if he/she would step up to the plate and take the challenge of help resolving this countries nightmare?

posted on Oct, 5 2010 @ 10:06 AM
William Howard Taft Was the President of the United States before he became Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

posted on Oct, 5 2010 @ 10:15 AM
reply to post by Romantic_Rebel

Personally I would vote for Earl Warren to be President. Seems the people who know the law are less crooked.

posted on Oct, 5 2010 @ 03:27 PM
reply to post by aliengenes

short answer all the judges beleive in the constitution cant have a president who follows the constitution.....

judge andrew napalitano id like to see as president or vice president............

top topics

log in