It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Dr. Niels Harrit: This stuff has only been prepared under military contracts in the USA and probably in bigger allied countries. This is secret military research. Do your own guess work and read Kevin Ryan's article on this subject. It was not prepared in a cave in Afghanistan.
Originally posted by filosophia
I believe all three buildings came down at free fall or near free fall speed, since you can time the collapse of the towers. As I said, it's so close that it can be said to be free fall speed, the main distinction being that it collapsed like a controlled demolition, with little to no resistance. So if you want to argue the exact science of it, first of all physics is never 100 percent exact, and second of all, having NIST do a report on building 7 for 8 years and then come out with a cover up is not scientific.
There you go again, judging websites you don't like as "truther" websites. That's apriori judgment which is prejudiced. And I said military grade because the antrax was military grade,
and the nano thermite came from the Mossad, so that is also military.
You say I'm acting as others are? Well gee, and no one can say that about you, huh? Osama Bin Laden, 19 hijackers, jet fuel?
Originally posted by filosophia
I believe all three buildings came down at free fall or near free fall speed, since you can time the collapse of the towers. As I said, it's so close that it can be said to be free fall speed,
Originally posted by filosophia
It is peer reviewed after all,
Originally posted by filosophia
www.indybay.org...
Oh wait, or is this a truther website?
Originally posted by exponent
reply to post by filosophia
Yes, Neils Harrit is an author of the paper and a truther. Besides you can verify he's wrong easily by downloading the paper I linked.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by filosophia
I believe all three buildings came down at free fall or near free fall speed, since you can time the collapse of the towers. As I said, it's so close that it can be said to be free fall speed,
Oh dear. yet another truther lie. You have not even bothered to watch the collapse of WTC 1&2, as if you had watched them collapse you would have seen that the debris that came off the buildings is falling at free fall speed, whilst the collapse of the 2 buildings is much slower than the debris, thus it can be shown that WTC 1&2 did not fall at free fall speed.
Why do truthers continue with this lie?
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by filosophia
It is peer reviewed after all,
Was it? Please state the names of those who peer reviewed it, if you are unable to show who peer reviewed it, why lie about it being peer reviewed?
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by filosophia
www.indybay.org...
Oh wait, or is this a truther website?
It is a website where you can easily see the lies by truthers,
" Dr. Niels Harrit: All the bomb sniffing dogs were sent home by the security company two weeks before."
Another truther lie, one of the dogs was killed
www.portauthoritypolicememorial.org... :
“Sirius, whose primary duty was checking trucks and unattended bags for bombs at the World Trade Center, died along with 37 members of the Port Authority Police Department when the towers collapsed on the morning of Sept. 11.”"
Originally posted by filosophia
Wrong, if there was any resistance at all, the tower would not have collapsed. And once again you provide no links to back up your claims. The towers fell in 10 seconds, you can test that alongside the video. Where are you getting this .75g? And if there was resistance, the towers would not have fallen!
Wrong again: nano thermite has no known military application. Of course there's a military application: it's called demolition
Mossad implications
www.infowars.com...
www.antiwar.com...
Anti-semitism? No, you are racist for assuming that anyone who criticizes Israel is racist.
Just so I know, do you deny Bin Laden was a CIA operative that worked with the agency up to 9/11 per Sibel Edmonds testimony?
Originally posted by filosophia
you are claiming that since it is not peer reviewed, it must not be peer review-able.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by filosophia
you are claiming that since it is not peer reviewed, it must not be peer review-able.
You really should stop making things up - You claimed the paper was peer reviewed, I simply asked you who peer reviewed it.... a question you seem unable to answer, so how do you know it was peer reviewed?
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by filosophia
you are claiming that since it is not peer reviewed, it must not be peer review-able.
You really should stop making things up - You claimed the paper was peer reviewed, I simply asked you who peer reviewed it.... a question you seem unable to answer, so how do you know it was peer reviewed?
Well, the Mossad did have access to the security, so I'd say that is a big enough suspicion. Sorry, I can't link you to the Mossad website where they admit they pulled off 9/11, however I can link to a website that has Netanyahu saying 9/11 was good for Israel.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by filosophia
so instead you are claiming it is not peer reviewable.
Again you go telling lies - you claimed it was peer reviewed, so how about telling us who peer reviewed it. Where did I say it is not peer reviewed?
there you go, now it has been peer reviewed.
You are showing your ignorance, you have no clue at all what peer reviewed actually means!