It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

[RINGS] Smirk find another ring?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 24 2004 @ 10:03 PM
link   
Oddly a new rule of.... one person can't claim more than 1 ring, was added today.

Why all the sudden?

Only thing I can think of is Smirk found it.




posted on Jun, 24 2004 @ 10:15 PM
link   
that would really suck if he did...cuz thats just not fair



posted on Jun, 24 2004 @ 10:22 PM
link   
I doubt it, they probably just caught it. Smirkley said that the did not want another and want to just help it along.



posted on Jun, 24 2004 @ 10:32 PM
link   
In order to make this a worthy venture for ALL involved it has been determined that clarification was needed. The recent posting of a logical conclusion (one ring per hunter) is simply the correct thing to do.

Master Smirkley, Captain of Enlightenment, has exactly the same number of rings today that he had last week.

ONE.

Clear your minds of the distractions and utilize that beautiful BRILLIANCE I have seen from you all week on solving the myriad clues being tossed upon your shoulders.



posted on Jun, 25 2004 @ 03:04 PM
link   
Ohh man ,... does this mean I have to send all the other's back?




Actually I think this new rule is a great idea and only fair to everyone. Although I am still playing the clue's big time, as they are really interesting and fun to solve when I am able to, any solutions or clue's I happen across will be offered outwardly. This question has come up before here and in the rings chat room, and it should be expected that the rule is in place for a fair reason.

It would have been real embarrassing anyway had I won more than one, or all four.


But one is pleasantly sufficient.


Now get out there people, there are rings to be found !!



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join