It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gallopinghordes
reply to post by hotbakedtater
I don't really much care how "confusing" it is. No means no, it doesn't mean maybe and it doesn't mean yes if the act has already started. She said no, he continued he's in the wrong. I find it disturbing that anyone or any law could for an instant believe that it's okay to continue a sex act when one of the participants has said no.
Originally posted by LadySkadi
reply to post by Phenomium
I would walk by and let the guy continue if I knew she had sexually manipulated him in any way. Women today don't have a use for men anyway right? Feminism has made us men obsolete......so when bad things happen like this.....fix it yourself!
That's cold...
I would agree, women of today have no use for *boys with attitudes like this...
Originally posted by LadySkadi
reply to post by Phenomium
you and I have a very different idea of what a "man" is...
Originally posted by theregonnakillme
reply to post by hotbakedtater
NO means NO! even if she has already said YES.
Originally posted by LadySkadi
reply to post by Phenomium
you and I have a very different idea of what a "man" is...
Originally posted by LadySkadi
reply to post by Banjamin Jefferson Madiso
My "overdeveloped sense of what a man is" tells me that a man does not continue to force a woman sexually, when she has made it clear that she wants him to stop.
edit on 3-10-2010 by LadySkadi because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LadySkadi
reply to post by Banjamin Jefferson Madiso
My "overdeveloped sense of what a man is" tells me that a man does not continue to force a woman sexually, when she has made it clear that she wants him to stop.
edit on 3-10-2010 by LadySkadi because: (no reason given)
But, please do notice, that the question posed, remained unanswered...I shall assume that she does not indeed have a man-servant, for I would wager that is exactly how she treats men, as her personal servants. Thats is why she has such specific requirements for them to meet. I have seen it over and over again, the woman with the gold vagina, and if any man wants in they have to have the right look, the right blood, the right genes and the have to pay the entry fee in order to compete with all of the other fools who think that one pu$$y is more special than any other...
LadySkadi, please do not take anything I have said personally, I, of course do not know you, so this is of the generalist of speculation. I do not mean to insult you particularly. I am merely taking a position in a discussion.
Originally posted by LadySkadi
reply to post by Banjamin Jefferson Madiso
Well, you know what they say about those who assume...
Straight up, back off the personal statements and questions. You aren't getting an answer because you don't rate an answer. It's as simple as that. The board is for topical discussion, not a discussion about my personal life.
Come to think of it, the fact that it was brought up as relevant is telling - it tells me you don't have an argument or a rebuttal worthy of it's own merit and have resorted to topic-shifting in order to make your post appear more relevant.
Weak sauce...
That's cold... I would agree, women of today have no use for *boys with attitudes like this...
......you and I have a very different idea of what a "man" is...
Originally posted by Phenomium
Originally posted by LadySkadi
Certainly you didn't say anything directly to me, but far be it from me to accuse a woman of a "passive" attack on a man's, well, manhood....but it clearly was an inference made by you referring to the context of the aforementioned post. You know what they say about people who live in glass houses?.....don't throw rocks at other peoples houses.
Originally posted by Banjamin Jefferson Madiso
LadySkadi, you may say what you will, I qualified all that I said that may have been taken personally as a stance on a position that I chose to advocate for a minute. It was in no way directed at you in a personal manner because I do not know ANYTHING about you in ANY personal manner.
That having been said, you go ahead and quote me and then try to attack me personally without any qualification, I accept that as well, because I have known forr a very long time that women do not fight fair. I too am no kid, I am in my mid 40's, I have three children, two daughters one grown up. I have had a few long term relationships and I don't even want to be in another one until I find a true Lady who knows how to ACT like a Lady, talk like a Lady and care for her Man as a Lady should. When I find her, I shall surely conduct myself as Her Knight, but she had better be worth my chivilry. Does that sound familiar? You will be a Lady when you find a worthy Knight?
What should be promoted is SYMBIOSIS, or Companionism, two equals who co-exist with minimal drama and maximum mutual respect. The fact is Humans cannot endure without both the phallus and the womb...neither are exalted and neither need be subservient.