So you want Free Energy?, page 13

privacy

Pages: << 10 11 12 13 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times

reply posted on 7-10-2010 @ 09:25 AM by thoughtform

reply to post by Jim Scott

I believe the common consensus is that there is much more than just the technical deployment of such systems into the commercial/academia environment.

Most career minded scientists/scholars will avoid, and discredit instinctively, much like the discussion of aliens, until fairly recently.

So the long running question of 'Where is the scientific/professional validation?" , is not a fair question, ask Stan Meyer (errr. well, if you believe in channeling I suppose you could ask him directly :| )

If you research just the surface of suppressed technologies, you will find that the proof in their effectiveness is not found in public viewable large scale beneficial systems.

edit: there (to)-> their (hazards of typing in autopilot, amazing how my hands interpret the word from my brain).

edit on 7-10-2010 by thoughtform because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 7-10-2010 @ 09:59 AM by thoughtform

reply to post by Jim Scott

Jim,
Not trying to pick on you, you were just last post with that sentiment.

I'm guessing you didn't read the whole thread, mbzastava has made some very good points in terms of your ability to harness existing energy flows. Arguments, that are very simple and straight forward.
That is just the first level of understanding the implication, and it goes much further than that.

As mbzastava made an analogy to collecting energy from a stream from a paddle wheel, after you build the wheel, is it 'free energy'? is solar collection 'free energy' (after you have the panel)?

I would recommend really getting a grasp on what is meant by 'free energy' and how energy is used throughout our daily existence, and what it means to have absolute control over energy provisioning...

But it goes much further than that.

reply posted on 7-10-2010 @ 11:38 AM by nataylor

Originally posted by mbzastavaDoes any of that sound like a definitve law of physics to you?

There aren't "laws" definite states of matter. After all, there are numerous things that fall outside any classical definition, such as amorphous solids, liquid crystals, and super fluids.

And dude, if you're going to massage things in to your unsubstantiated view that plasma was only recently considered a new state of matter, just go to Google Books and search for 'plasma "fourth state of matter"' and shoot down every book there. It'll take a while.

Fact is, plasma has been referred to as a state of matter for over a half century. You just haven't been paying attention, or you had particularly crappy teachers/professors. And now you want to retcon things to make science fit your personal, incomplete view.

reply posted on 7-10-2010 @ 01:06 PM by TeslaandLyne

Plasma being atoms in a condensation misses the true energy source
which is in between all the atoms.
I'd say plasma is seen in those Sun flares made by the energy explosions
on the Sun.
The loss of the in between atomic forces creates the plasma.
Plasma is thus devoid of the inter atomic forces of the normal state.
Free energy is in the transfer which is forbidden.
Energy was sought to be transferred to everyone for free.
That is because a loss less energy transfer was discovered.
That was the free part.
The energy is free if you harness the biggest energy plant in the Sun.
Since the Sun explosions mean energy is being transmitted we might
set of North Pole energy receivers perhaps to capture large charge
currents.

reply posted on 7-10-2010 @ 01:17 PM by Miccey

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Free energy is in the transfer which is forbidden.
Energy was sought to be transferred to everyone for free.

Forbidden??

Why, by who and for what reason???

reply posted on 8-10-2010 @ 09:07 AM by TeslaandLyne

Originally posted by Miccey

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Free energy is in the transfer which is forbidden.
Energy was sought to be transferred to everyone for free.

Forbidden??

Why, by who and for what reason???

That was the Tesla Towers episode when JP Morgan never added funding.
One Tower by Niagara Falls was to set up oscillations going through the
conducting Earth. Power would also go through the air or more according
to Tesla a loss less medium to power aircraft. This according to the many
depictions of the project and starting with 1892 lectures and efforts at
Colorado Springs till 1900. The Tesla ether is his electrical sound waves
carrier and loss less power transmission medium and not any other kind
or reference. We would be hard pressed to find workers in this field except for
engineers at present working on the flying machine which is well hidden
for 50 years and everyone seeks disclosure on.
So perhaps the whole anti Tesla conspiracy started with JP Morgan.
No free energy for us.

reply posted on 8-10-2010 @ 12:33 PM by Miccey

We "the masses" have to stop being so submissive.
WE have to toghen up. Stand up to the regime. I mean
they CANT kill us all....LOL

edit on 8-10-2010 by Miccey because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 8-10-2010 @ 12:42 PM by cupocoffee

Originally posted by Miccey
We "the masses" have to stop being so submissive.
WE have to toghen up. Stand up to the regime. I mean
they CANT kill us all....LOL

I hear you, Miccey!

But, instead of going to war against "the regime", what if we built some free energy devices instead? And get a whole bunch of publicity?

That would be a better move, don't you think?

reply posted on 8-10-2010 @ 01:57 PM by TeslaandLyne

William Lyne's Letter to President Barak Obama, July 27, 2009

No mention of Tesla.
Why not.
What is Disclosure with out Tesla.

New thinking is mandated by reality at this time, a true "industrial revolution in clean energy" as your Secretary of Energy Steven Chu says.

Not strong enough.
Obama's energy agents from the cartels: Circular file this.

reply posted on 8-10-2010 @ 04:18 PM by Matyas

reply to post by cupocoffee

Steve Smith is dead. Another victim of the NSA psychic killing machine. He was a hell of an engineer, and only wanted free energy for the world.

Two down I worked with so far. That is how you can tell when it is real cupo, people are killed. I don't see people getting killed around Bearden and Bedini. So shove your master drivel where the Sun never shines.

reply posted on 8-10-2010 @ 04:24 PM by cupocoffee

reply to post by Matyas

Did this just happen, Matyas?

reply posted on 8-10-2010 @ 04:49 PM by Matyas

reply to post by cupocoffee

Yes.

reply posted on 8-10-2010 @ 05:00 PM by cupocoffee

reply to post by Matyas

Matyas, if you just lost a friend then I am very sorry for your loss.

But your inference that Bedini and Bearden and Friedrich's technology can't work because they are all still alive is highly illogical. I doubt you would say such things if you were not emotionally distraught....

reply posted on 9-10-2011 @ 11:25 AM by joshuaatkinson