I could not find the free part. It looks as if they have invented the electric motor. As we all know, they do not run for free.

Anything with a permanent magnet has a good start.
The problem with capturing ambient energy with electrical wires means using a lot of
wires means owning a copper mine as well and the secret science police will find
out about the large wire accumulation and come a knocking.
They know what to look out for because they are told.
They are just doing their job under orders.
A Tesla ambient generator is said by Mr. Lyne to have 5 or 50 miles of wire
and runs a fair sized submarine.

The government has been suppressing over unity devices for years along with other energy saving devices via the DOE and other agencies. Est'd over 5000 devices.

An acquaintance of mind, electrical engineer is presently testing one over unity design that is VERY efficient. It could easily supply a house or small business.

I check keelynet.com and peswiki every day for new updates in this field.

There is also the PAP engine making it's way to the market. It runs on noble gases. CK virgine-engine.com

You should really use the search function as a post like this is highly insulting to the members here.

These devices are scams. There's a real good reason why there are none of these in operation, and it isn't because of oil company conspiracies. From wikepaedia please learn and deny ignorance!

The law of conservation of energy is an empirical law of physics. It states that the total amount of energy in an isolated system remains constant over time (is said to be conserved over time). A consequence of this law is that energy can neither be created nor destroyed: it can only be transformed from one state to another. The only thing that can happen to energy in a closed system is that it can change form: for instance chemical energy can become kinetic energy.
Albert Einstein's theory of relativity shows that energy and mass are the same thing, and that neither one appears without the other. Thus in closed systems, both mass and energy are conserved separately, just as was understood in pre-relativistic physics. The new feature of relativistic physics is that "matter" particles (such as those constituting atoms) could be converted to non-matter forms of energy, such as light; or kinetic and potential energy (example: heat). However, this conversion does not affect the total mass of systems, since the latter forms of non-matter energy still retain their mass through any such conversion.[1]
Today, conservation of “energy” refers to the conservation of the total system energy over time. This energy includes the energy associated with the rest mass of particles and all other forms of energy in the system. In addition, the invariant mass of systems of particles (the mass of the system as seen in its center of mass inertial frame, such as the frame in which it would need to be weighed) is also conserved over time for any single observer, and (unlike the total energy) is the same value for all observers. Therefore, in an isolated system, although matter (particles with rest mass) and "pure energy" (heat and light) can be converted to one another, both the total amount of energy and the total amount of mass of such systems remain constant over time, as seen by any single observer. If energy in any form is allowed to escape such systems (see binding energy), the mass of the system will decrease in correspondence with the loss.
A consequence of the law of energy conservation is that perpetual motion machines can only work perpetually if they deliver no energy to their surroundings.

Originally posted by Symbiot
Well please enlighten me, how is it that a permanent magnet exerts a force without a power input?

How do you think a permanent magnet is made.... by magic? There is energy input to make one, so you have to consider that, they also lose their magnetism over time and with use.

if the machine works, it works. F**k your physics.

Trial and error is all that matters, If I could set up a dozen of these little generators - charging batteries or something - run my house from the batteries, lets say the batteries fail & need replacing every 8 months, yet the whole thing still saves me 70% of my old energy bills in cash, sorry if you disagree but that is close enough to free energy for most of us....you can debate the word 'free' as much as you like but if the damned thing works, people will be popping off the grid like no tomorrow.

-B.M

Well it's nice to see that someone gets the idea. I agree whole heartedly, obviously. Charging batteries is actually the idea I had in mind with this device. I did use the term free in the title, but I think I elaborated and mentioned that it's actually just extremely cheap energy because there would likely need to be parts replacement from time to time. I'm not really sure why some people are so hell bent on discouraging these types of ideas. If we go through life never trying to accomplish what we think to be impossible then we'll never know for sure what is and what is not possible.

Originally posted by Symbiot
I'm not really sure why some people are so hell bent on discouraging these types of ideas. If we go through life never trying to accomplish what we think to be impossible then we'll never know for sure what is and what is not possible...

regarding alot of the people who are rude to others because we can't follow the technical jargon, lingo, etc of their education.

Well really whose failure is it? ours - a failure of understanding?
or theirs - a failure to dejargon something for the laymen?
I'll answer with another question, whats the point of knowing if you can't explain your knowledge to anyone?

It would feel like a complete chicken on a sinking boat full of headless chickens
& the complete chicken (janitor) explains to the headless captain what to do...
but without ears...the communication fails...

These people are disgruntled that they've spent so much of their lives learning something that threads like this suggest (to them) that they wasted that time on.

I believe its just disgruntled....ness.....

-B.M

Where would we be today if people simply obeyed what they were taught rather than thinking outside of the box so to speak.

Where would we be today if people believe in fairies, the make-believed, santa and any hoaxes? What if people didn't reject hoaxes and instead embraced them to 'think out side the box'? Why do people like me discourage projects like this? Because you're supposed to learn from history. They never work. They're always hoaxes. Magnets, electricity, and electromagnets are understood very well, arranging them in someway isn't going to make a magical device. People could instead focus their efforts on reality, and instead make the world a better place, instead of using their time to make hoaxes. This doesn't mean don't experiment, but maybe try to limit it to the actual unknown... not permanent magnets or other well known and thoroughly tested principles of physics.