reply to post by Romantic_Rebel
Ok, either way you look at it, reppin Stalin is not a good idea. If you are an ATS Member and an atheist, and a capitalist, how come you don't realize
that AGW is indeed a hoax?
IF you are open minded and receptive to logic and reason, I will take a few minutes and explain the truth to you. In the mid 2000's it was
conclusively determined that the globe had not been warming for several years, this did not bode well with the hoaxers, who were merely attempting to
set the stage for their worldwide Carbon Credit Trading Scam, I mean Scheme. So the name of the cause was was replaced with something ambiguous,
That was a ridiculous move, the Global Warming movement relied on the assertion that the Earth was cooking in mankind’s waste gasses, particularly
carbon dioxide. Global Warming is portrayed as a bad thing, which it is probably not, and the politically correct stance to take on this matter was to
be against the globe warming. OK. Climate Change, was adopted as the movements’ new name so as to be covered if the Earth warmed OR cooled. The
hoaxers, in the MSM, CRU/East Anglia University, NASA, NOAA, IPCC, countless sheeple, and various other LIARS and MORONS, continued to claim that mans
very existence was killing the ecosystem, through the sheer volume of carbon dioxide we produce, and that carbon dioxide causes the atmosphere to
retain and trap heat resulting in the global temperature rising. Those assertions are 100% untrue. The most abundant and effective greenhouse gas is
watervapor. Carbon accounts for so little of the existing greenhouse gasses in our upper atmosphere, that it is not even worth consideration.
Watervapor however accounts for 85% of greenhouse gasses.
AGW vs Climate Change
We were supposed to be against Global Warming, as I said, the idea that the Earth was getting warmer was pushed on us as a bad thing, devastating,
life threatening. How could that possibly be the case if the planet were actually cooling? This was never fully explained, but the assertion that any
climatic change was bad for us. So I must assume here that we are also supposed to be against the idea of Climate Change. But, the climate always
changes, it always has, for billions of years now, the climate has always been in a state of flux. The ONLY POSSIBLE ways to stop the climate from
changing would be to stop the Earth from rotating, AND to get rid of the moon. Fact is, you cannot be "against" climate change, it is completely
natural and pretty much the reason we do have life in its abundance on this wonderful ball of rock. Climate Change is not caused by man, and man
cannot stop it.
Al Gores Warming -AGW- Anthropomorphic Global Warming completely made up.
Al Gore made some outrageous claims in his movie, An Inconvenient P.O.S. He claimed that warming was driven by carbon dioxide, from Al Gore's own
charts and graphs it can be shown that warming drives carbon dioxide levels, not the other way around. Al Gore claims that the polar ice caps are
melting away, and that the polar bears up north were in serious danger from having to swim many many miles in their search for land on which to hunt
and forage. Mr Gore even had an animated segment of a polar bear drowning in the vast ocean while he was swimming something like 60 miles which Mr
Gore claimed was a dangerously long way for a polar bear to have to swim. FAIL! Mr Gore did not do his homework, the Polar Bear is classified as an
AQUATIC MAMMAL, which means that the polar bear is just at home either on land or in water and they certainly do not drown. Polar bears routinely swim
more than 100 miles at a time...
Scientific Consensus, overwhelming majority agreement...
Science is not determined by consensus, period. Science is determined by The Scientific Method, which involves, Problems, hypotheses, theories,
experiments with control groups and intensive observation, peer review and above all else, REPRODUCTION of RESULTS! There was NONE of this involved
with the claims of AGW and or CC. In fact the proponents of AGW/CC refused to share their data for peer review; they refused to release data via the
Freedom of Information Acts in both the USA and in the UK. In fact, a large amount of the "data" collected in support of AGW was destroyed illegally,
rather than shared with other scientists for the proper and accepted process of peer review.
Al Gore and the IPCC claimed to have an overwhelming majority of "scientists" in agreement on AGW so the Science was Settled. Since science is NEVER
determined by any majorities, nor by any consensuses, that just cannot be the case. In fact the AGW camp had boasted having over 1800 "Scientists" and
up to as many as 2500. As difficult as it is to believe that any scientist would compromise his or her integrity and/or good standing in support of a
HOAX, that is in support of a trading SCAM, I will accept those numbers as accurate. The Petition Project, is a petition with the signatures of over
31,000 real Scientists, including over 9,000 PhD's who say that AGW is not real and that man does not cause the earth to heat up or cool down. Now if
you'd like to accept overwhelming majorities and consensuses to determine the truth in science, then AGW is blown away by the sheer numbers alone,
2,500 at best, vs. 31,000, more than 15x.
Phil Jones of Climatic Research Unit of East Anglia University was interviewed on the BBC a few months back. In that interview, "Dr" Jones admitted
leaving both the Medieval Warm period and the Little Ice Age out of his "Hockey Stick Graph" seriously misrepresenting the historical climate record.
He also admitted that there had been no significant warming since 1995. That means that, the entire production of An Inconvenient P.O.S. was false,
all lies. And they all knew it all along, including Mr Internet Inventor, Al Gore. Let alone the thousands of dammning emails revealing the contempt
the members of CRU the IPCC and other AGW Agencies had for those who wished to review theyr finding, those who disagreed with their assertions, and
anyone else who even questioned their claims. Also included was evidence that CRU and the rest of them were fabicating and falsifying their "data"
proving that the earth was warming, which it was NOT!
There is more I could add to this, but I think there is more than enough here to verify or even disprove for yourself, depending on your intention,
but I guarantee that you will not disprove anything I have stated in this post...
edit on 1-10-2010 by Banjamin Jefferson Madiso because: To fix typos
edit on 1-10-2010 by Banjamin Jefferson Madiso because: (no reason given)