The Royal Academy to discuss “extra-terrestrial life and the UN agenda” *BREAKING NEWS*, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 178 times


reply posted on 1-10-2010 @ 04:56 AM by rajaten
reply to post by zorgon



True I completely forgot about Hawking.

Cheers I'll add it to the list. It might have to become a database by next week


reply posted on 1-10-2010 @ 05:04 AM by zorgon
reply to post by rajaten


Can you make a post listing all the threads on the different releases? I am putting stuff together now. Just the main ones on each topic, we don't need all the side channels and clones



reply posted on 1-10-2010 @ 05:09 AM by yeti101
reply to post by zorgon



so the increase in the subject of ET life is down to some sort of disclosure agenda or aliens visiting earth in spaceships?

Nothing to do with the fact that our planet detection capability has increased by an order of magnitude. That we are starting to discover small rocky worlds. That within 3 years kepler will deliver to the scientific community the frequency of earth-like planets in earh-like orbits around stars like our sun. Nothing to do with that at all?

Also the royal societyaren’t talking about aliens visiting earth in spaceships and personally meeting them lol theyre talking about if a signal is detected and communication back & forth.


reply posted on 1-10-2010 @ 05:33 AM by rajaten
reply to post by zorgon



Wow I forgot about that NORAD officer. Maybe he was truly in the loop on the hidden agenda.
That is a very close date, Im REALLY excited now!


reply posted on 1-10-2010 @ 05:33 AM by yeti101
reply to post by zorgon



your rambling. The supposed "signal" wasnt detected from Gliese so i dont know why you would try and connect a planet discovery with that signal. Even though you admit it never came from there

a scatter gun approach tring to link diffirent things doesnt do your credibility any favours.

What list are you talking about and whats some prediction got to do with it? Also what are skeptics supposed to be denying



edit on 1-10-2010 by yeti101 because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 1-10-2010 @ 05:34 AM by Merigold
reply to post by rajaten



1) The UN appoint an ambassador for first contact!........! - Nope. Sorry. Didn't happen.

2) U.S. Nuclear Weapons Have Been Compromised by Unidentified Aerial Objects leading to an event at the Press Club in DC that was covered by the MSM .......! - So? MSM covers lots of stories. UFOS have been in the news since the dawn of television.

3) Vatican’s astronomer says he’d love to ‘baptise an alien’.......! And?

4) Discovery of the first earth like planet able to produce life........! One of of what are portentially millions of planets that may be capable of producing life...


5) Mars, Here We Come! Congress Approves $19 Billion NASA Budget.....! Pfft...9 billion? Please that won't get us to Mars, hell that won't get us to the moon!


6) Stephen Hawking, one of the most respected and revered scientific minds comes out and states his position on the topic........! It's mathematically problematic to deny that life outside of us exists.

I know you're excited, but none of these "signs" mean anything.

Disclosure of what is almost certainly a fact, that life is not unique to Earth, has already happened. It's accepted in most circles. No one can really deny it, can they? I don't think there are any reputable people who would go on record to deny it.


reply posted on 1-10-2010 @ 05:37 AM by rajaten
reply to post by Merigold



There comes a point when your flipping that coin after tail, tail, tail, tail, tail, tail when you cant help but expect something ODD

Too many coincidences for me.

Good luck to you though


reply posted on 1-10-2010 @ 05:44 AM by Merigold
reply to post by rajaten



What coincidences, please tell me, specifically?

It's not a coincidence that aliens have been in the media since the beginning of the media.

It's not a coincidence that the scientific community would acknowledge the obvious.

I mean people....I wish it were true too...I really do.


reply posted on 1-10-2010 @ 06:13 AM by infinite
reply to post by hesse




At a minimum of 1.9 Earth masses, it is the smallest extrasolar planet discovered around a normal star, and the closest in mass to Earth. At an orbital distance of just 0.03 AU from its parent star, however, it orbits further in than the habitable zone. It is unlikely to possess an atmosphere due to its high temperature and strong radiation from the star.


Gliese 581e
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



UFO Filmed From Avebury Crop Circle, UK With Multiple Witnesses
  Posted 19 days ago with 89 member flags
The Men In Black(OPs) The Aviary & UFOs
  Posted 12 days ago with 83 member flags
Did a RAF Tornado crash during a UFO intercept mission in 1997?
  Posted 14 days ago with 39 member flags
What is this comming out of our star?
  Posted 9 days ago with 33 member flags
Huge Unknown Objects orbiting the Sun for months...?
  Posted 8 days ago with 29 member flags
The CIA and the UFO Mythos
  Posted 16 days ago with 26 member flags
UFO Reporting for the 21st Century!
  Posted 12 days ago with 26 member flags