The Royal Academy to discuss “extra-terrestrial life and the UN agenda” *BREAKING NEWS*

page: 2
178
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 04:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by yeti101
Anyone that cannot see that there is a sudden major surge in ET interest, especially the way main stream media is all over it right now, is quite frankly, just fooling themselves


No those would be the people standing on the streets looking at the spaceship in the sky.
The ones that saw all this coming are the ones that left all major cities.
Like the movie 'Independence day'




posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 04:56 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


True I completely forgot about Hawking.

Cheers I'll add it to the list. It might have to become a database by next week



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:04 AM
link   
reply to post by rajaten


Can you make a post listing all the threads on the different releases? I am putting stuff together now. Just the main ones on each topic, we don't need all the side channels and clones



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:08 AM
link   
I just want to say good job people!! I will be watching this thread closely! Star & Flag!!



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:09 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


so the increase in the subject of ET life is down to some sort of disclosure agenda or aliens visiting earth in spaceships?

Nothing to do with the fact that our planet detection capability has increased by an order of magnitude. That we are starting to discover small rocky worlds. That within 3 years kepler will deliver to the scientific community the frequency of earth-like planets in earh-like orbits around stars like our sun. Nothing to do with that at all?

Also the royal societyaren’t talking about aliens visiting earth in spaceships and personally meeting them lol theyre talking about if a signal is detected and communication back & forth.



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:12 AM
link   
A green comet is heading towards us?!


Green comet 103P/Hartley 2 is approaching Earth for a close encounter on Oct. 20th. At that time, the comet will be only 11 million miles from Earth and should be dimly visible to the naked eye from dark sky sites.

www.spaceweather.com...




posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by rajaten

1) The UN appoint an ambassador for first contact!.......




This is not true! Look it up, the UN and appointee deny it...it didn't happen.

The rest is interesting and imo something is up...but not sure what.



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:22 AM
link   
reply to post by mblahnikluver
 


Whether official or not.
Believe what you must.



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by yeti101
Also the royal societyaren’t talking about aliens visiting earth in spaceships and personally meeting them lol theyre talking about if a signal is detected and communication back & forth.


Signals? Hmmmm oh yeah those things... Like the message we just sent to Gliese, the new planets announced this week (though we had some known already in that system) and there is this
Laser-like signal coming from Gliese 581e???
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Now that has all gotten mixed together even though the laser signal was from Tucanae... but signals are in the news


Deny deny deny... but hey, each to their own


For the list.... seems this came first... odd that

September 13, 2010
Retired NORAD Officer's New Book Predicts a Tentative Worldwide UFO Display on October 13, 2010
www.prweb.com...



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by mblahnikluver
This is not true! Look it up, the UN and appointee deny it...it didn't happen.


Well you say its not true yet that 'appointee' is going to make an appearance at the Royal Society that is discussing "Extra-terrestrial life and arising political issues for the UN agenda"?

So UN has an ET political agenda, and yet denies the appointment... Well seems fishy to me



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:33 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


Wow I forgot about that NORAD officer. Maybe he was truly in the loop on the hidden agenda.
That is a very close date, Im REALLY excited now!



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:33 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


your rambling. The supposed "signal" wasnt detected from Gliese so i dont know why you would try and connect a planet discovery with that signal. Even though you admit it never came from there


a scatter gun approach tring to link diffirent things doesnt do your credibility any favours.

What list are you talking about and whats some prediction got to do with it? Also what are skeptics supposed to be denying




edit on 1-10-2010 by yeti101 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:34 AM
link   
reply to post by rajaten
 


1) The UN appoint an ambassador for first contact!........! - Nope. Sorry. Didn't happen.

2) U.S. Nuclear Weapons Have Been Compromised by Unidentified Aerial Objects leading to an event at the Press Club in DC that was covered by the MSM .......! - So? MSM covers lots of stories. UFOS have been in the news since the dawn of television.

3) Vatican’s astronomer says he’d love to ‘baptise an alien’.......! And?

4) Discovery of the first earth like planet able to produce life........! One of of what are portentially millions of planets that may be capable of producing life...


5) Mars, Here We Come! Congress Approves $19 Billion NASA Budget.....! Pfft...9 billion? Please that won't get us to Mars, hell that won't get us to the moon!


6) Stephen Hawking, one of the most respected and revered scientific minds comes out and states his position on the topic........! It's mathematically problematic to deny that life outside of us exists.

I know you're excited, but none of these "signs" mean anything.

Disclosure of what is almost certainly a fact, that life is not unique to Earth, has already happened. It's accepted in most circles. No one can really deny it, can they? I don't think there are any reputable people who would go on record to deny it.



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:37 AM
link   
reply to post by Merigold
 


There comes a point when your flipping that coin after tail, tail, tail, tail, tail, tail when you cant help but expect something ODD

Too many coincidences for me.

Good luck to you though



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:38 AM
link   
The 13th October prediction is nothing, but a rumour. If you think about it, why would an advance civilization appear, unannounced, in the Earth's atmosphere? It would create mass panic - not the perfect method to create a peaceful coexistence with humanity.



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 05:44 AM
link   
reply to post by rajaten
 


What coincidences, please tell me, specifically?

It's not a coincidence that aliens have been in the media since the beginning of the media.

It's not a coincidence that the scientific community would acknowledge the obvious.

I mean people....I wish it were true too...I really do.



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 06:08 AM
link   


Dr Bhathal's discovery had come just months before astronomers announced that they had found a similar, slightly less habitable planet around the same star 20 light years away. This planet was called Gliese 581e. Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... l#ixzz116Wwb9pi


www.dailymail.co.uk... l



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 06:11 AM
link   


Mazlan Othman, the head of the U.N.'s little-known Office for Outer Space Affairs (Unoosa), is set to describe her potential new role as chief alien ambassador next week at a scientific conference at the Royal Society's Kavli conference center in Buckinghamshire, England, reported London's Sunday Times. "Nonsense," responded the U.N.

"The mandate of the Office for Outer Space Affairs is defined by the United Nations General Assembly and there are no plans to change the current mandate," Jamshid Gaziyev, a spokesman for the agency, told FoxNews.com.


Sounds to me that they are simply denying the new appointment... "no plans to change the current mandate" But the Office for Outer Space Affairs sure is real


www.foxnews.com...



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 06:13 AM
link   
reply to post by hesse
 




At a minimum of 1.9 Earth masses, it is the smallest extrasolar planet discovered around a normal star, and the closest in mass to Earth. At an orbital distance of just 0.03 AU from its parent star, however, it orbits further in than the habitable zone. It is unlikely to possess an atmosphere due to its high temperature and strong radiation from the star.


Gliese 581e



posted on Oct, 1 2010 @ 06:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by hesse

Dr Bhathal's discovery had come just months before astronomers announced that they had found a similar, slightly less habitable planet around the same star 20 light years away.


Dr Bhathal's signal came from Tucanae, not Gliese 581



edit on 1-10-2010 by zorgon because: No way I will tell





top topics
 
178
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join