It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by EnactedEgoTrip
Well they do say laws are there to be broken
I suppose the question then becomes what gives us the ability to choose what laws to obey and which to break.
is there a clear victim with a clear loss suffered?
if not, then the law is arbitrary and useless.
Originally posted by gandhi
In many cases it can be very right to break the law, and even wrong to follow the law.
Its about damaging ones freedoms. If you are hurting others, then its wrong. However, if you are not, that is where in my opinion the law dose not belong. Because its damaging everyones freedoms.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
I'm talking more about things like Euthanasia, physically lashing out at someone who has hurt your child etc
Glad you like the thread
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by EnactedEgoTrip
Well they do say laws are there to be broken
I suppose the question then becomes what gives us the ability to choose what laws to obey and which to break.
Originally posted by EnactedEgoTrip
Yep that is an issue. It is ultimately down to the individual. This is the problem with laws - they are only someones opinion (or desire) as to what should be the law. Unfortunately the people who make our laws do not have our interests at heart, and never have done. All they care about is power and wealth. The lawmakers are corrupt so the law is corrupt.
Originally posted by Maxmars
When there is a law that is unjust, it is our moral duty to disobey it.
Unjust laws persist because we do not break them.
I explained that even though you wont read it in the Drivers manual, it is a unspoken common curteousy to give a blinking of your headlights if there is a cop ahead trying to catch speeders...