reply to post by WhisperingWinds
I remember reading a thread where you were trying to say that Paul the apostle was the one who told Christians they must be circumcised, and
based your whole argument on it.
Well, it is in the bible, after all.
"Indeed I, Paul, say to you that if you become circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing. And I testify again to every man who becomes circumcised
that he is a debtor to keep the whole Law. You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by the Law; you have fallen from
grace. (Galatians 5:2-4) Of course Paul turned against it later, and began to rail against circumcision. See Galatians 5:11,12. He refers to
circumcision as "the mutilation" in Philippians 3:2.
If you go twisting words around , and put your own meaning to them, you can expect those with respect for the bible to point out your
mistakes.
Friend, how can one "twist" the words of a book that has been altered and convoluted half to death, after being edited for a year by two of the
biggest Sorcerers who ever lived? "Paul" either didn't exist at all, or was played by one of the Pisos, of was just made up by Bacon and Dee.
I'll tell you what is blatantly wrong. Your Bible is. From being religious cop, to grand master of the church, from beast fighter in Ephesus to
beheading in Rome, Paul's story has more holes than a round of swiss cheese. Of the 22 times in the Bible where Paul is referred to as an
"apostle", only twice is he referred to as an apostle by someone other than himself. These two instances came from the same person. Paul's buddy
and companion and press secretary Luke. Paul alone names Luke (Colossians 4:14; 2) (Timothy 4:11). He does not mention his own name in the Gospel or
in the Acts.
only, you say it like you are crazy....which doesn't really help your case!
