It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So then the time times & half a time are 42 months or 1260 days or three years & an half, recconing twelve months to a yeare & 30 days to a month as was done in the Calendar of the primitive year. And the days of short lived Beasts being put for the years of lived [sic for “long lived”] kingdoms, the period of 1260 days, if dated from the complete conquest of the three kings A.C. 800, will end A.C. 2060. It may end later, but I see no reason for its ending sooner. This I mention not to assert when the time of the end shall be, but to put a stop to the rash conjectures of fancifull men who are frequently predicting the time of the end, & by doing so bring the sacred prophesies into discredit as often as their predictions fail. Christ comes as a thief in the night, & it is not for us to know the times & seasons wch God hath put into his own breast
- Isaac Newton's occult studies
Newton may not have been referring to the post 2060 event as a destructive act resulting in the annihilation of the globe and its inhabitants, but rather one in which he believed the world, as he saw it, was to be replaced with a new one based upon a transition to an era of divinely inspired peace. In Christian and Islamic theology this concept is often referred to as The Second Coming of Jesus Christ and the establishment of The Kingdom of God on Earth. In a separate manuscript[17], Isaac Newton paraphrases Revelation 21 and 22 and relates the post 2060 events by writing:
Originally posted by redgy
not sure about the early histories, but for today religion isn't the cause of holding science back, it is contributed to the compartmentalization of these groups, the specialized groupings/no variety within each sector of such and the money hungry p.t.b that enforce the programs that are undertaken. wether these p.t.b include certain heads of religious sects or not, it still all comes down to the money figures in motion and nothing to do with belief of self.
Originally posted by redgy
maybe spirituality is only a form of brain washing, or things that have been taught from beginning of life but can science or it's many answers truely prove such as truth or why these thoughts manefest as same or similar in design even from as child before the knowledge of oneself is fully even known.edit on 8-10-2010 by redgy because: added line
The rational action is incapable of knowing what is, it only knows what appears to be, it has no plummet by which it can sound the depths of being, it can only survey the field of becoming
Originally posted by NostradumbassThe fact is you have to take a step back and realize the only ones who can be trusted are the ones who have experienced the most throughout their life. The ones who are grateful and loving no matter what they experience or what you do to them. If you can trust someones actions completely then you can trust what they say without consequence.
Hopefully that makes sense. You don't have to connect thousands of ideas and phrases around in your head to finally "understand" something. You just have to know how to open up and trust things around you that you couldn't before.