So I have been thinking and getting confused by the backyard photos.
First of all, Marina has admitted to taking them hasn't she? So surely that should verify that they are genuine, but people don't believe that. I have
to admit I find them a bit dubious.
Obviously there are quite a few (or perceived) anomaIies in these photos, but the most glaring one to me is the issue with Oswald's fingers when he is
holding the paper (I will leave the strange angle he is standing at and the line across the chin for a later date).
What caused his fingers to appear to be cut off at the tips?
Could it be that his fingers are hidden by the paper he is holding?
Or that the angle he is holding the paper has made his fingers appear deformed (I think this could be likely).
Or he may have had slightly malformed fingers, I don't think I have ever read that he had, but he could have.
I don't believe these suggestions but they are possibilities. Also, seen as his wife corroborated these photos, these would seem to be of the more
But part of me thinks, as has been stated by other researchers, is that it is an effect of editing or creating those photos.
However, if this is the case, why did Marina say they were genuine? Fear? Money?
This really confuses me. I would tend to believe Maria but those fingers bug me.
I have also seen a Jack White presentation where he stated that the backgrounds were the same picture.
He says when the backgrounds of a couple of the backyard photos are isolated and transferred to a see through medium like acetate, you can angle one
to the other and they will line up exactly, therefore proving the photo was fake.
I have not seen this demonstrated anywhere else and combined with the relative simplicity of the experiment would suggest that this effect is not
real. What do you think?
edit on 23-5-2011 by doubleplusungood because: (no reason given)