Terrorists In WI Assault Citizens With Violence And Extortion, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 28 times


reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 07:17 PM by slinger
reply to post by mnemeth1


They where following the Law should be end of story! And the old lady should be arrested for calling 911 without cause! A good lawyer should eat up this police dept


reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 07:35 PM by mnemeth1
reply to post by hippomchippo


I find the police extremely intimidating considering they are armed and have a monopoly on the use of violent force.

Anyone that attempts to openly display the same rights the police have is subjected to violence and extortion.


reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 07:36 PM by hippomchippo
Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by hippomchippo


I find the police extremely intimidating considering they are armed and have a monopoly on the use of violent force.

Anyone that attempts to openly display the same rights the police have is subjected to violence and extortion.

I don't like the way police operate myself either.
But, do you agree with people bringing firearms to family restaurants as a way to provoke a response?
I think it's obvious thats what these people were doing.



reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 07:36 PM by snusfanatic
reply to post by hippomchippo




every action taken by the government is by threat of violence. the government is the only entity that can forcibly wrestle you to the ground, detain you, lock you away, and maim or kill you if you resist in the process. this applies to everything, taxation, etc. actions taken by police officers are worse because the threat of violence is much more immediate.

now, you may not agree with those 8 men's right to bear arms, but its the law. there's lots of laws i disagree with to, but i don't advocate violence in advancement of my view of how the world should be. These police men were most likely simply ignorant of the law in this case, but if they were not, and were performing these actions to MAKE A POLITICAL POINT then that is in every way the definition of terrorism.

ter·ror·ism (tr-rzm)
n.
The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.


1. UNLAWFUL (under the color of law, while clearly against its meaning)
2. USE OF FORCE OR VIOLENCE (defacto)
3. BY A GROUP (police men)
4. AGAINST PEOPLE (these citizens)
5. FOR PURPOSE OF COERCING (changing and discouraging legal behavior)
6. SOCIETY (any citizen that has the right to bear arms)
7. FOR IDEALOGICAL REASONS (nuff said)



edit on 27-9-2010 by snusfanatic because: needed edit



edit on 27-9-2010 by snusfanatic because: more editing



edit on 27-9-2010 by snusfanatic because: simply embarassing grammer and spelling skillzzz



reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 07:38 PM by hippomchippo
Originally posted by snusfanatic
reply to post by hippomchippo




every action taken by the government is by threat of violence. the government is the only entity that can forcibly wrestle you to the ground, detain you, lock you away, and maim or kill you if you resist in the process. this applies to everything, taxation, etc. actions taken by police officers are worse because the threat of violence is much more immediate.

now, you may not agree with those 8 men's rights to bear arms, but its the law. there's lots of laws i disagree with to, but i don't advocate violence in advancement of my view of how the world should be. These police men were most likely simply ignorant of the law in this case, but if they were not, and were performing these actions to MAKE A POLITICAL POINT then that is in every way the definition of terrorism.

ter·ror·ism (tr-rzm)
n.
The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.


Relax, tex.
Like I said earlier, I don't disagree with the second amendment, personally I think it's a pretty good way of warding off tyrants.
But when it's used in this capacity to try and rile people up and get a response, I don't like it, it's just distasteful.
Just my opinion.


reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 07:44 PM by mnemeth1
reply to post by hippomchippo


I'm not assuming anything - other than peaceful people have an inherent right to do what they want as long as they aren't harming anyone else or their property in the process.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why Cops Fear-WARNING-As disturbing as Kelly Thomas video X 10
  Posted 14 days ago with 143 member flags
No jobs avalible anywhere!!!!!
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
LIVE Ustreams of NATO Summit Protesters in Chicago!
  Posted 9 days ago with 48 member flags
House Votes to Cut Food Stamps to Avoid Defense Reduction
  Posted 14 days ago with 41 member flags