It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EnlightenUp
They'd only shoot them because they hate our freedom, so naturally, no, since freedom haters have no rights.
Originally posted by oozyism
Simple question really:
Do Afghans have a legitimate right to fight, kill any and all American soldiers in Afghanistan?
Pros and Cons.
Trolls Welcome.
My thoughts, yes they do.
The reason is debatable.
What do you guys think?
oz
Originally posted by Death_Kron
I'm not sure how you can say that the Taliban aren't an enemy but hey there you go....
you're lucky you're not fighting mexican cartels.
Originally posted by EnlightenUp
Originally posted by Death_Kron
I'm not sure how you can say that the Taliban aren't an enemy but hey there you go....
I didn't state there whether they were or weren't, which was immaterial anyway when dealing in fear tactics. One thing is for sure, an enemy that is easily digested as such by one's psyche is always needed so you feel vulnerable enough to support government machinations.
with the same usual suspects in them.
Originally posted by shamus78
reply to post by Death_Kron
lol you have to kidding. Right? I'm guessing you're kidding.
The amount of innocent people killed in the Afghanistan war far outnumbers the 'insurgents'. What a quagmire.
Cheers
Shane
In the years since 2005, the mounting insurgency has resulted in more direct civilian deaths being caused each year by insurgent actions than by coalition military action. Overall, however, the number of direct civilian casualties that have been attributed to insurgent forces by the available estimates remains less than the number that have been attributed to U.S.-led airstrikes and groundfire since 2001