It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Its too bad the vast majority of candidates endorsed by the tea parties have been republicans, and the cycle continues I guess.
Originally posted by Jenna
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Its too bad the vast majority of candidates endorsed by the tea parties have been republicans, and the cycle continues I guess.
No, it's too bad the media only pays attention to the few Republican candidates with tea party endorsements that they can find dirt on.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
I don't think the media is is playing to one attention because if this was both a Republican and Democratic wipe out, it'd be better news.
Not one third party tea party candidate has won or gained sufficient votes, so why the absent tea party votes? The last guy, Kennedy, gained a petty 1% of the vote in mass.
Source
Noam Chomsky has criticized NPR as being biased toward ideological power and the status quo. [...] Thus, political pragmatism, perhaps induced by fear of offending public officials who control some of the NPR's funding (via CPB), often determines what views are suitable for broadcast, meaning that opinions critical of the structures of national-interest-based foreign policy, capitalism, and government bureaucracies (entailed by so-called "radical" or "activist" politics) usually do not make it to air.
Originally posted by Jenna
Oh please. You know as well as I do that our society likes dirt better than anything.
They won't start talking about the decent tea party endorsed candidates
Because other local tea party groups were supporting Brown in that particular race. Brown had more tea party supporters vote for him than Kennedy did, so he won.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
There is plenty of information out there, choices that are made clear, and yet we continue to see major party candidates voted in by tea party voters as with other voters.
Not once have we seen the fruits of a third party candidate win from the tea party movement.
Well these third party candidates simply do not receive enough support, and that is nobody elses fault but the voters who choose not so.
The media is not fair, it will always give attention to those with big support, and yet third party candidates have yet to gain that from tea parties.
I am yet to see a tea party movement behind a third party candidate that actually wins.
Originally posted by jambatrumpet
It is composed mainly of conservatives, many of whom hold racially biased beliefs