posted on Sep, 26 2010 @ 10:00 PM
reply to post by impressme
Here are some excellent photos of the Windsor . From a different site .
Please note that the steel section collapsed due to fire . The section that didn't collapse was the reinforced concrete section .
And , please don't play ignorant of the fact that truthers have tried to compare the collapse of WTC to the "non-collapse" of the Windsor . You are
very well aware of what I am talking about .
The bottom line is , the structural steel in the Windsor COLLAPSED due to fire . The only reason there wasn't a total collapse of the building was due
to the fact of there being concrete reinforced technical floors and a concrete reinforced core , plus the fact that the fire was being actively fought
As for documented papers to prove the authenticity of these photos , that is a fallacious argument and you know it . If this is the game you are going
to play , I will leave you to play it with someone else . I'm sick and tired of these grade-school antics some of you guys rely on .
Look at those photos and tell me two things .
1) Tell me how the WTC can be compared to the Windsor , as they are clearly two different types of constructs .
2) Look at those photos and tell me that structural steel will not collapse due to fire .
If you come back with any more of the immature discourse about papers and such , I will be obliged to ignore you also .
edit on 26-9-2010 by okbmd because: ETA