It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Get what I am trying to show you here?
the Tea Party, the grassroots movement committed to reining in what they perceive as big government, and fiscal irresponsibility, also appear predisposed to intolerance. Approximately 45% of Whites either strongly or somewhat approve of the movement. Of those,
only 35% believe Blacks to be hardworking,
only 45 % believe Blacks are intelligent,
and only 41% think that Blacks are trustworthy.
Perceptions of Latinos aren’t much different.
While 54% of White Tea Party supporters believe Latinos to be hardworking, only 44% think them intelligent, and even fewer, 42% of Tea Party supporters believe Latinos to be trustworthy.
When it comes to gays and lesbians, White Tea Party supporters also hold negative attitudes. Only 36% think gay and lesbian couples should be allowed to adopt children, and just 17% are in favor of same-sex marriage.
CBS News and the New York Times surveyed 1,580 adults, including 881 self-identified Tea Party supporters, to get a snapshot of the Tea Party movement. There is a lot of information to unpack; let's begin with the demographics.
Eighteen percent of Americans identify as Tea Party supporters. The vast majority of them -- 89 percent -- are white. Just one percent is black.
Originally posted by saltheart foamfollower
reply to post by maybereal11
I created a poll the other day to say exactly what I wanted it to say. Exactly what the poll you posted here was created for.
Yeah, nice try.
Oh, and by the way, wasn't it the NAACP that called for the Tea Party to be proactive?
Oh I see, damned if they do and damned if they don't.
I get the Saul Alinsky technique in your ways.
So, your argument is if there are no black people they are racist, if there are black people they are racist.
Tell me, if they are not racist, WHO IS THE RACIST ONE?
Originally posted by saltheart foamfollower
reply to post by maybereal11
I created a poll the other day to say exactly what I wanted it to say. Exactly what the poll you posted here was created for.
Originally posted by saltheart foamfollower
I get the Saul Alinsky technique in your ways.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by saltheart foamfollower
Get what I am trying to show you here?
That you live in a fantasy world and deflect the topic when your arguments aren't going well?
Not sure how you think you upset me...but feel free to think you did...if it makes you feel better.
I'm sorry if you love the Tea Party...and I'm sorry you can't see that it has racist undertones. I would be upset by being affiliated with a racist movement too...and I might even try to deflect that fact by projecting on to others...as you are doing.
edit on 27-9-2010 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by saltheart foamfollower
Bush is not "my guy"...but nice try.
I was pointing out the use of this guy as a token black guy by the Tea Party...not once did I state anything about the individual. It is about how the Tea Party, and the OP, is using him.
"HEY look....we have a black guy...so we aren't racist."
Try all you like...I'm not bothered by your attempt at redirection. The Tea Party can continue to parade any minority that shows up or speaks at a Tea Party.
..and I will continue to call it out as putting up their "token" minorities to show that the 99% white crowd isn't racist.
Originally posted by maybereal11
Your "movement" might be racist if...
You have to stand up and shout..post a youtube video etc...saying "Hey!!! Look!! We have a black guy!!!"
The very fact that this man has celebrity status within the movement says everything.
source=http--www.discoverthenetworks.org-guideDesc.aspcatid=162&type=issue
Liberals, who have always claimed to be the authoritative source of progressive attitudes on race, have actually become one of the centers of racist thinking in America over the last quarter century, a period of time in which postwar liberalism itself was being reconfigured by the radical Sixties worldview. Liberal racism began in the last years of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s life, when organizations such as the Black Panther Party and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) radicalized the issue of color in America by focusing on legitimate “black rage” and the “institutional racism” they claimed was embedded in the “DNA” of American society. King was an obstacle in their path; they rejected the gains he had achieved as illusory. This was no mere intellectual disagreement about a strategy for improving race relations in America; it had a bitter personal component. The black radicals and their white supporters derided King as “De Lawd” and “Uncle Martin.”
Later on, after King’s assassination, most of those who had expressed contempt for him during his lifetime would pay cynical homage to his martyrdom. But they never embraced his vision of an integrated social world. Rather, the program of these liberal racists, both white and black, focused on separatism and racial difference. Instead of subscribing to King’s belief in a colorblind society, they wanted government policies that were color-coded. The further America progressed from the dark days of slavery, the more they insisted that slavery was present in America’s social institutions and its personal interrelationships. The U.S., they asserted, was steeped in blood and guilt: it must pay for its crimes against “people of color.”