TRUTHERS! How do you feel about Obamas Comments about Ahmadinejad 9/11 accusations?

WOW, well I know there are post of what the Iranian President said at the UN but here are Obamas own words in response.

"OFFENSIVE"
"INEXCUSABLE"
"HATEFUL"

Obama was pretty annoyed in the interview with BBC persian News and used words that imply he is deeply aggravated about the US gov being linked with 9/11.

Obama slams Ahmadinejad...

too say that he is pi**ed off would be an understatement. We are aware that politicians have to use watered down words and phrases to come across as diplomatic, however his comments used the words HATE and OFFENSIVE. Now in his book "Dreams of my father" he quite often used those words to describe racial issue he was going through, with his Dad being black and his mum being white.

So this could be very interesting on what he chooses to do about people who he claims are spreading "HATE" and "OFFENSIVE" gossip about HIM and his government. He takes things quite personally, and I am sure a man like him like revenge in the truest sense of the word. He has always felt put down and attack.

So TRUTHERS, how do you think he will deal with this? Are you in danger? Will he seek those people out and put an end to it/them. I would bet that given his personal feelings to people he judges do him wrong Truthers are going to be on his s*** list big time.

What do you guys think???

nothing obama says matters.he needs to go!

Offensive- Lying to the American public.

Inexcusable - Keeping information from the citizens even when they ask questions.

Hateful - The general attitude bestowed upon Iran to start another war that will bankrupt America.

reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R


what took my link and posted it as a thread? You know I could of done that myself.

Originally posted by dragnet53
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R

 

what took my link and posted it as a thread? You know I could of done that myself.

Does not make much sense? This is a thread to ask truthers (mainly US residing) if they feel they are now targets?

I am a truther, I love Obama's comments. He is 100% correct and to the point.


The real truth is that 9/11 was an outside job.

Originally posted by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
This is a thread to ask truthers (mainly US residing) if they feel they are now targets?

It's the typical government "screw you, we're going to keep covering this up, and you won't get a new investigation" bulljunk.

And I think we've been targeted long before this, especially by the supposed thousand man Q Group established through the NSA on his watch, and as reported by Wayne Madsen on Russia Today.

These are some of the thoughts I entertain concerning this subject.

America's Obama and Iran's Ahmadinejad.

Two meat puppets busy distracting a world full of individuals not paying attention to international martial law and global agenda(s). communism, socialism, democracy, capitalism, ect.... All the same form of governments which do not permit their citizens to live long enough to learn the number of the rules (laws) to the game, let alone what they are, or what they all mean when held in context to one another simultaneously.

What do I think?

I think 343 firefighters died on 9-11, and that the remaining firefighters were not permited to do their official investigation, and that those who continue to ignore that professional firefighter investigations were never permitted are essentially at war with an entire profession, and their standards and procedures developed over a long period of time and acknowledged and recognized by most nations on Earth. This is what I think.

What does Obama say? Obama says what Obama is told to say.
What does Ahmadinejad say? Ahmadinejad says what Ahmadinejad is told to say.
What do American UN delegates do? American UN delegates do what American UN delegates are told to do.
What does the Press report on? The Press reports on what the Press is told to report on.
What do editors edit? Editors edit what editors are told to edit.

What do firefighters do?

These are some of the thoughts I entertain concerning this subject.

343,
ET

reply to post by Esoteric Teacher


I don't get it...

How come I wasn't told what to say? or....

Hmm. I guess that VISA pays, but the truth incriminates... reverse incrimination?

W O W .....

Originally posted by Heyyo_yoyo
reply to post by Esoteric Teacher

 

I don't get it...

How come I wasn't told what to say?

source, please?

reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R


Well, I don't really give a crap what A-Jad says or Obama says.

Call me crazy, but I think they are both reading from a script.

You did, ask..........

reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R


What did Obama really say??? Nothing....

What did Ahmadinejad say?
The same thing that has been said by 100million Americans, petetioned by New Yorkers and questiond by many more millions around the world....That is, give us a new, unbiased investigation into the events of 9/11...

The victims of that day and the 100,000 plus that have died since, deserve nothing less...

Originally posted by kyred
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R

 

Well, I don't really give a crap what A-Jad says or Obama says.

Call me crazy, but I think they are both reading from a script.

You did, ask..........

I have to agree. More and more , everday, the whole show is looking completely scripted.

A lot of people in power are doing a lot of talking but they are beginning to relise no one is listening anymore. I think they are fading. They will soon dissappear completely. Can't you see it?

Very strange days.

reply to post by JohnySeagull

A lot of people in power are doing a lot of talking but they are beginning to relise no one is listening anymore. I think they are fading. They will soon dissappear completely. Can't you see it?

We can only live and hope..

reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R

So TRUTHERS, how do you think he will deal with this? Are you in danger?

What do you guys think???

[color=gold]Ahmadinejad: UN should form fact-finding committee on 9/11
President Barack Obama responded to Ahmadinejad in a BBC Persian service interview Friday saying: "Well, it was offensive. It was hateful."
"And particularly for him to make the statement here in Manhattan, just a little north of Ground Zero, where families lost their loved ones, people of all faiths, all ethnicities who see this as the seminal tragedy of this generation, for him to make a statement like that was inexcusable," Obama said.

www.rawstory.com...

I have absolutely no respect for Ahmadinejad, and I believe he is a national threat to the entire world however, what I find “inexcusable” are the lies the US government told the American people and the ground zero families who lost their love ones.

What I find “offensive” is the silence from our National News media and our government leaders and their continuing to parrot the OS, after it has been proven false. Obama walk out was understandable considering how embarrassing it was, I mean what can you do when you continue to lie to the American people about 911, I guess Obama had no choice, but to walk out.

I think it is “hatful” of our government to arrogantly play on highly educated minds with their pseudo science and defying Newton’s laws of physics in deceiving the American people from the truth. I suppose both administrations, Bush & Obama do not believe the victim’s families deserve the truth.
I am born and raised in America and this is not the country I was raised in where we have no accountability in our government and a grate lost of our free Press.

You asked Does Obama’s comment affect Truthers? In my opinion, no it doesn’t, most Americans are now waking up from the use of the internet and they are learning how corrupt our government is. The majority of the American people are to busy trying to keep their heads above water in this sinking economy to worry about what is going on in Washington DC.

reply to post by impressme

I have absolutely no respect for Ahmadinejad, and I believe he is a national threat to the entire world however

I agree with all of your post accept this part....What has he done to be considered a National Threat ???

reply to post by CynicalM

What has he done to be considered a National Threat ???

Ahmadinejad has admitted publicly that the Holocaust never happened; second he wants nothing better than to wipe Israel off the map. Any government who wishes to wipe out a group of people, a country because they are successful in everything they do, are truly sick, envious, and full of hatred. In my eyes, he can be considered as dangerous as Hitler.
Either the man is completely ignorant or he just another monster who wishes to kill all Jews.

reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R


Just some poxy deflection and reinforcement of the approved mindset, the percentage of most American and European populations who believe the OSCT is risible.

reply to post by impressme


Go back and do some real research instead of listening to MSM crap

Out of interest, the following is a transcript of Ahmadinejad's actual comments at the UN that concerned 911:


"First, the event of the 11 September 2001 which had affect the whole world for almost a decade.

All of a sudden, the news of the attack on the twin towers was broadcast using numerous footages of the incident.

Almost all governments and known figures strongly condemned this incident.

But then a propaganda machine came into full force; it was implied that the whole world was exposed to a huge danger, namely terrorism, and that the only way to save the world would be to deploy forces into Afghanistan.

Eventually Afghanistan, and shortly thereafter Iraq were occupied.

Please take note:

It was said that some three thousand people were killed on the 11 September for which we are all very saddened. Yet, up until now, in Afghanistan and Iraq hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, millions wounded and displaced and the conflict is still going on and expanding.

In identifying those responsible for the attack, there were three viewpoints.

1- That a very powerful and complex terrorist group, able to successfully cross all layers of the American intelligence and security, carried out the attack.
This is the main viewpoint advocated by American statesmen.

2- That some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order also to save the Zionist regime.
The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree with this view.

3- It was carried out by a terrorist group but the American government supported and took advantage of the situation. Apparently, this viewpoint has fewer proponents.

The main evidence linking the incident was a few passports found in the huge volume of rubble and a video of an individual whose place of domicile was unknown but it was announced that he had been involved in oil deals with some American officials. It was also covered up and said that due to the explosion and fire no trace of the suicide attackers was found.

There remain, however, a few questions to be answered:

1- Would it not have been sensible that first a thorough investigation should have been conducted by independent groups to conclusively identify the elements involved in the attack and then map out a rational plan to take measures against them?

2- Assuming the viewpoint of the American government, is it rational to launch a classic war through widespread deployment of troops that led to the death of hundreds of thousands of people to counter a terrorist group?

3- Was it not possible to act the way Iran countered the Riggi terrorist group who killed and wounded 400 innocent people in Iran. In the Iranian operation no innocent person was hurt.

It is proposed that the United Nations set up an independent fact-finding group for the event of the 11 September so that in the future expressing views about it is not forbidden".

Source


I suspect the purpose Obama's bizarre response is to deter reasoned debate of what are surely not unreasonable comments by Ahmadinejad.