Originally posted by Styki
I am going to attempt to disagree in a more polite way. Sorry if my last post was distasteful.
Originally posted by SevenThunders
I used those negative examples, because it is they who are driving up the health care costs. It's not rocket science. You force coverage on 25
million deadbeats and you will get health care rationing and increased premiums.
This bill isn't forcing the insurance companies to cover 25 million "deadbeats", it's forcing the "deadbeats" to go out and buy insurance. I am going
to go ahead and switch the term "deadbeats" with the uninsured. Forcing the uninsured to buy health insurance isn't going to raise premiums. For
that to be true, you would have to believe that all of the uninsured were sick. Health insurance companies have expenses when their customers are
sick. That's besides the point because the currently uninsured will be purchasing insurance.
Well thats just too damn funny;
looked outside your "computer room" lately? Nobody is purchasing ANYTHING! Most of whats left of the middle class is expecting to deal with
("skyrocketing" I believe the prez said "necessarily skyrocketing") energy costs and Inflated food costs,Thanks for piling on.
The overall result of this system is most insurers will simply disappear
So the much touted claim:"You can keep your current plan!" was bold faced shallow lie. Anybody with more than a middle school mentality can see the
result will be to force Everybody onto whatever "govsurance" is "offered.
Originally posted by SevenThunders
Why do I call them deadbeats? Well because of illegal aliens using emergency care as their personal physicians we have a system breakdown in many
border states.
This is the primary reason why the health care reform made it mandatory for the uninsured to buy health insurance. If everybody has insurance, then
the uninsured cannot use emergency care while the tax payers pick up the bill. They will already be covered by the insurance which they purchased.
It's the same reasoning as to why it's illegal to drive without car insurance. If somebody hit's you, then you will not be stuck with the bill.
I realize that mandatory heath insurance is one of the more unpopular parts of the health care reform, but it's somewhat understandable.
Insurance companies are going to lose money now that they have to cover people with pre-existing conditions. Previously they could just refuse to
cover those which would end up costing them more than they would profit. Now, they will have to cover these individuals (most likely at a higher
rate) and take the loss.
It's not a perfect plan. No plan of this magnitude could be. We can all assume that adjustments will need to be made as the plan goes into effect.
I'm not happy with the plan. I would like to see an option which left the For-Profit companies out.
This "thing" is a monster of a bureaucracy (with plenty of room for new fiefdoms and inflated empowered bureaucrats).You will see the: " If we are
paying for your health care; We think fast food should be rationed or legislated" San-fran just did that to happy meals.
"food justice"!

edit on 18-11-2010 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)
edit on 18-11-2010 by 46ACE because: (no reason
given)
edit on 18-11-2010 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)