It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Teresa Lewis's planned execution has been publicised everywhere from the UK to Iran. Her case is unusual for three reasons. Lewis plotted with two men to kill her husband and stepson, leaving the door of their home open and buying guns and ammunition for the killers. She pleaded guilty and was sentenced to death. The gunmen Matthew Shallenberger and Rodney Fuller only received life sentences. Continue reading the main story “Start Quote Prof Victor Streib With Lewis's IQ measured at just 72, both her current legal team and death penalty opponents have suggested it is wrong to execute her and wrong to think she is like
The key piece of evidence they wanted considered was a letter from Shallenberger, who killed himself in jail in 2006, in which he claimed full responsibility for the murder plot and suggests he pushed Lewis into it.
The 41-year-old Lewis died by lethal injection at 9:13 pm. Relatives of the victims watched through two-way glass, as supporters gathered outside the prison to protest the execution.
The Associated Press writes:
Lewis appeared fearful, her jaw clenched, as she was escorted into the death chamber. She glanced tensely around at 14 assembled corrections officials before being bound to a gurney with heavy leather straps. Then, as the drugs flowed into her body, her feet bobbed but she otherwise remained motionless. A guard lightly tapped her on the shoulder reassuringly as she slipped into death.
Capital punishment is wrong
United States needs to abolish death penalty sentence
By Ryan Hanschen
Published: Monday, February 23, 2004 - Updated: Monday, May 18, 2009 16:05
The death penalty in the United States is an inherently flawed punishment, wrought with class and racial biases.
It is a cruel and unusual punishment that does not act as a deterrent, costs more than a life sentence and, above all, is an abuse of human rights. There has never been a conclusive study that proves that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to crime.
The facts speak for themselves: "Consistent with previous years, the 2002 FBI Uniform Crime Report shows that the South repeatedly has the highest murder rate. The South accounts for over 80 percent of executions. The Northeast, which has less than one percent of all executions in the United States, again had the lowest murder rate."
Not only do the numbers disprove theories of deterrence, but a 1995 Hart Research Poll of police chiefs in the U.S. found that the majority of the [police] chiefs do not believe that the death penalty is an effective law enforcement tool.
Many citizens who support the death penalty claim that executing their fellow citizens is cheaper than imprisoning criminals for life. The facts prove contrary.
"It is three times more costly to execute a prisoner than it is to keep them in a single cell at the highest security level for 40 years," according to The New Press. In Texas, "sending a killer to death row costs an average of $2.3 million," reports the Dallas Morning News.
Because of the vast appeals process, capital punishment is quite cost ineffective. Despite the appeals process, capital punishment is faulty in nature, as it relies on the fallible nature of human beings. Room for human error is huge. According to The Nation, "Between 1973 and 1995, seven out of 10 death-penalty cases were thrown out on appeal due to flaws in the trial."
Is this justice being served?
Countless studies have proven that the death penalty in the United States is riddled with bias - not only in class injustices, but also in racial injustices. The facts speak for themselves -- Amnesty International reports that "95 percent of all people sentenced to death in the United States could not afford their own attorney."
Source: www.duclarion.com...