Being Gay isnt natural, page 43


Pages: <<  40    41    42    43    44    45  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 46 times


reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 03:06 AM by joechip

But the underlying fact here is that I doubt anyone at all has a clue what you said or meant. That was my point.
reply to post by Hefficide


Your doubts could hardly be characterized as "facts." I mean, I guess it's a "fact" that you can't comprehend clear English, but to assume the rest of ats shares your problem is reaching. And as you still haven't bothered to express what you find so puzzling, I have to wonder what you're getting at; while my statement was unambiguous and direct.
What do you think I said or meant? Why don't go you ponder this on your own, as I had no hidden meaning whatsoever, and I've told you that, and you still would like to pretend not to understand.


reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 03:29 AM by joechip
reply to post by Hefficide




I couldn't tell you if you actually held a positive or negative opinions of gays or if your apparent misogynistic nature had overpowered your intended anti-homosexual sentiment.


Wow dude. How about you take me at my word that I meant what I said. It wasn't complex. It wasn't difficult at all to understand. I'm done with you. That you could take my comments as homophobic means you just have a problem with me and are attempting to start a flame war. Go soak your head.


reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 03:34 AM by Curiousisall
reply to post by Hefficide


I really hate to see you all arguing amongst yourselves like this. Please allow me to translate what I took away from his post that has caused this uproar.

Men and women do not have compatible sex drives. This is a fact. He said that two gay men or more likely to have pretty much the same sex drives.

He is saying he is jealous of the fact that a gay couple, male or female really, is likely to fight less over one being in the mood while the other is not as is so often a problem with straight couples.

He is saying that since men do not have PMS, that a couple of men will not come across that as an issue. He is jealous of that. Sorry but I cannot blame him. PMS does cause rational thought to fall behind emotional instability. It is what happens during a flush of hormones. Some suffer worse than others. My sister suffers from Premenstrual Psychosis. Live with that for a good time!

He is pointing out something that anyone that spends time in gay clubs can tell you. In a straight club, the less attractive people are more often alone. In a gay club, everyone finds a "friend." While there are superficial people of all kinds, it would appear that for every twink lover, there is a bear lover and that ratio does not seem to translate to straight clubs. He is jealous that ugly people can find love as easily as good looking people in the gay community on a level slightly better than that in the straight community.

Then, he was telling the OP that if the OP is so concerned with keeping with what is natural then the OP should go live in a cave and eat berries.

Not trying to get in the middle here but I just hate to see you all fight like this. Just makes me so sad when you have so much more worthy targets for your ire within this thread.


reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 03:43 AM by Mogul Flames
Originally posted by rusethorcain
Originally posted by Mogul Flames
reply to post by rusethorcain


Sorry no, I came across it whilst looking for my own post in case someone had commented and wanted a response, had to edit after as I've never replied to a post before and hit it too soon.


I apologize for assuming and should have given you the benefit of the doubt. Thank you for the clarification.


That's alright mate, I can understand that this is quite a heated thread. All the best.


reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 03:43 AM by Hefficide
reply to post by Curiousisall


If you are correct, then that is all I was asking for. The statement about "nature" was ambiguous and could have referred to the op stating that homosexuality is not natural. But it could have also referred to the many of us who have said that homosexuality, simply by existing is a part of nature and, therefore, natural.

I do thank you for helping!

edit on 9/27/10 by Hefficide because: bb code error



reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 03:48 AM by joechip
reply to post by Hefficide


Disingenuous or not, (I believe you were) you refused to accept that I wasn't saying anything but what I said. It was not unclear, merely succinct. If you require elaborate explanation in order to comprehend simple statements, see Curiousisall's post above. But I know better. You knew exactly what I was saying. Let's just not interact anymore, okay?


reply posted on 27-9-2010 @ 03:59 AM by ugie1028
reply to post by AndrewJay


So are you claiming its a disease of some sort? are you claiming t to be some sort of fluke of nature?

You need to learn, you need to take a step back and realize what your saying.

Added: no one pushes anything on anyone unless there is force actually added. Its your own choice to read on this subject. its your choice to read what others are saying. its not like anyone has shotgun to your head saying 'accept gays or die.' You only let it affect you unless you want it to affect you.



edit on 9/27/2010 by ugie1028 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  40    41    42    43    44    45  >>    ^^TOP^^