Being Gay isnt natural

Originally posted by Haydn_17

Originally posted by henriquefd
I think ATS should allow us to give negative stars and flags. 'Cause this OP diserves them.

ATS members happily discuss Religion with a negative outlook.

Whats so different, or is a "Gay" thread a taboo subject?

It seems to be a taboo only to you, my friend. Everyone else here seems to think Gay is OK. You are the one saying it is a crime against nature.

It's not what to talk about, but how you address it. Try discussing the holocaust and put on the thread title "THE HOLOCAUST NEVER HAPPENED! ITS PURE BS!" and then write in the OP "Oh, I probably offended some people..." well, DUH!

Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
It was social trends that ensured that people were not gay (Atleast openly) for how many thousands of years?

Not that many. Remember Greece etc. The baths. Naked statues of boys all around. This anti-gay thing is a very Puritanical thing. Blame extreme Christians, which is ironic considering the priests and all their scandals.

Originally posted by Haydn_17

Originally posted by SearchLightsInc

I'm sorry my friend but you need to let go of this idea that being "Gay" is wrong. There enough straight human beings in the world to keep the population stable. Not everyone is attracted to the same sex and for many, there attraction isnt enough for them to go chasing the fantasy.

Many homosexuals feel they have no choice - They simply are who they are. And if they are not hurting anyone, why then should we bother ourselves with how humans choose to love one another?

I understand that.

But what happens when the Gay population starts overtaking the Straight population?

It wont happen in our lifetime, but to someones generation there is a very big chance that it will.

Oh dear, when you speak like that you make it obvious your very homophobic. What do you dislike the most about gay people?

reply to post by henriquefd


The deaths of millions of innocent people is much more significant.

Originally posted by Haydn_17
Being Gay is against Humanity and Nature, our core objective as a species is to reproduce, to keep our species alive, there is no such thing as an immortal organism. They all die, and to continue the survival of the species they must all reproduce before they die. To keep the species stable.

People forget, we are surrounded by technology, social trends, but deep down, really we are animals, animals with basic instincts, to survive, to reproduce, for some reason our society is losing its instinct to reproduce, 1% of the UK see themselves as being Gay or Lesbian, not much, but what will the figure be like in 100 years time? 10%?

I know i have probaly offended a lot of people with this thread, i don't intend to, i just want to understand where has the instinct to reproduce with the opposite sex gone?

Sex is a primal instinct. Having sex has little to do with the need to reproduce. If every time we had sex, we were reproducing, women would be having very little sex, because being pregnant isn't really really fun. Neither is the labor involved in having the child. Or the prospect of having dozens of kids.

reply to post by henriquefd


I could quite happily write a thread on "Christianity its all BS"

And nobody would batter an eyelid.

Originally posted by Haydn_17

But what happens when the Gay population starts overtaking the Straight population?

It wont happen in our lifetime, but to someones generation there is a very big chance that it will.

Quit worrying about nonexistent.

It makes you only appear as ignorant. If you oppose gay so heavily, you are also denying free will etc etc. Gay people will never be but only a fraction of population. You know, they are often refered as minorities. And I think I take heed of this advice.

I hope you do understand one day.

-v

Have your truth anyway you want it my friend.

Which is more a crime, a man who lays with a woman out of hate, or a man who lays with a man out of love.

Who is the greater villain, the man who takes a woman for a wife, because society said he should, or a man who takes a man for a husband because his heart said he should?

Who is the blind man, the man who rids his heart of hate and learns to love all, or the man who fills his heart with hate for those who are not like him?

Judge not, love all, be at peace.

With Love,

Your Brother

Originally posted by Haydn_17
reply to post by henriquefd

 

The deaths of millions of innocent people is much more significant.

Either you missed the point or you're derailing this purposefully. EIther way, troll, you got the attention you wanted. 2nd page already. Yaaaaaay....*leaves thread*

Originally posted by snowspirit

Originally posted by Haydn_17


Sex is a primal instinct. Having sex has little to do with the need to reproduce. If every time we had sex, we were reproducing, women would be having very little sex, because being pregnant isn't really really fun. Neither is the labor involved in having the child. Or the prospect of having dozens of kids.

Yes, but sperm was designed to go into a ladies vagina, and produce a baby. Not another man.

Or am i going to get called an idiot for saying that fact?

know i have probaly offended a lot of people with this thread, i don't intend to, i just want to understand where has the instinct to reproduce with the opposite sex gone?

The desire to reproduce is alive and well, and I don't think you need to be concerned over waking up and finding half the population is gay.

It's more important to accept people for who they are, rather than worrying about how they became the way they are. Every face you meet has a story behind it. Every single one. Some might share their stories with you someday, and perhaps then you can begin to understand that it's okay for people to be different than you.

I think acceptance comes with understanding.

People are going gay because the prostate is a lot more sensitive than the nerve endings at the head of the penis. Procreation isn't the only reason for people to have sex, in fact there are many health benefits for having sex, and I mean different kinds of sex too.

reply to post by v01i0


Who says im against gays "heavily" ? Stop being so over sensitive, as i said before, i can happily sit next to, converse, with Gay people. I don't get creeped out by them, im not disgusted.

There's been some studies showing that as far as evolution goes, gays could have helped families survive helping to spread the gene. I think it's an interesting theory.

Originally posted by ladyinwaiting

know i have probaly offended a lot of people with this thread, i don't intend to, i just want to understand where has the instinct to reproduce with the opposite sex gone?

Some might share their stories with you someday, and perhaps then you can begin to understand that it's okay for people to be different than you.

I think acceptance comes with understanding.

I do understand, a few of my Highschool friends turned out Gay, i didnt stop being there friends, but i did sit down and think to myself, why?

If evolution designed us to have sex with the opposite sex, why don't you feel that way?

Originally posted by Haydn_17
reply to post by v01i0

 

Who says im against gays "heavily" ? Stop being so over sensitive, as i said before, i can happily sit next to, converse, with Gay people. I don't get creeped out by them, im not disgusted.

Then why are you making a thread about how loving someone of the same sex is a crime against humanity and nature?

Originally posted by Haydn_17 Being Gay is against Humanity and Nature

If you would take away the unnatural aspects of reproducing (and I'm not talking about porn etc.) like surrogates, IVF, adopting etc. I can't see the problem with being other then heterosexual. It is definitely not a crime against nature, since nature had this neat development, they won't reproduce.

Humanity is a concept formed by humans. It is humanity that ultimately made it possible to reproduce unnatural like IVF, surrogates, adopting etc. , for people that are naturally excluded of the reproductive part of the species. Gays are just a part of that group. I call it "that" group because of the thesis natural reproductiveness or not.

The so-called "problem" of the thesis stated by the OP is just part of a bigger "problem"

But eey that's me, I'm just an dumbass.



The boundary between social acceptance and social exclusion is made by a person who is as retarded as the person on the other side.

reply to post by ghaleon12


No, thats wrong.

That would be live saying, every straight man or women wants to rape every other straight man or women.

Originally posted by Haydn_17

But what happens when the Gay population starts overtaking the Straight population?

It wont happen in our lifetime, but to someones generation there is a very big chance that it will.

With all due respect sir but, you're on crack! Homosexuality isn't contagious! Besides, I'll step up and do the right thing and start fathering all the rest of the babies from here on out. At least I know the IQ of the human race would increase and I'ld be having a ball!

(and before anyone says that statement is technically wrong because IQ is based on the average intelligence of the human race and if the human race got smarter as a whole then their IQs would still all be based on a 100 on average... I KNOW THAT...it was just a little joke)

Originally posted by SearchLightsInc

Originally posted by Haydn_17
reply to post by v01i0

 

Who says im against gays "heavily" ? Stop being so over sensitive, as i said before, i can happily sit next to, converse, with Gay people. I don't get creeped out by them, im not disgusted.

Then why are you making a thread about how loving someone of the same sex is a crime against humanity and nature?

AS I SAID BEFORE, i find it quite hard to put my thoughts into words, i dont mean crime as a crime to be sent to jail crime.