Reply to Reply to Posting on Antigravity Drives...
> [one reader wrote: "Forgive me, but a few questions...
> If the above [U.S. military possessing antigravity craft] is true, why pursue conventional
technologies such as Aurora, SR-71, space shuttles, stealth fighters, etc.?"
RB:
Interested inquirer,
The military-intelligence-weapons industry complex pursues parallel development of
modernized conventional technologies for several reasons. Among these are: 1) to provide
"national security" cover for/distraction from covert projects under development. NASA does the
same, dazzling the peons with Shuttle missions to grow petunias in low gravity in orbit, while
secret, undeclared military missions travel far into space; 2) to have some obsolescent military
toys (like F-15s) to sell to friendly countries and keep most of them satisfied that they are in
possession of the "latest" weapons systems; and 3) to feed the pork barrel of multi-billions
spending in the defense industry sector which Congress so effectively manages.
II: > Why hasn't this technology been used in combat applications? Where was this high technology
during the Gulf War? What good is it, if it's not applied?
RB: And what makes you think that such high-technology was not employed in the Gulf War?
:-) The classified Nautilus spaceplane was.
II: >Why keep it a secret if it's been around for 26+ years? Don't you want your enemies to know
that you're that far ahead of them?
RB: No, not particularly. Not if revealing your latest tech will spur enemy regimes to spy on,
copy, steal and/or build same.
II: > Isn't that the point of the Cold War? Maybe we're just waiting around, hoping to be attacked so we can use it?
RB: The Cold War is over. Out ultra [ET] tech assures that America is effective policeman of
the world.
II: > What "renegade" group has the budget, scientists and resources to do this? And what about
Russia? Isreal? France? Germany?
RB: What makes you think that Russia/USSR has not already developed antigravity craft? And
Russia's plasmoid dual-beams weapons system is state-of-the-art Star Wars technology, (which
they offered to share with the U.S.)
As for Germany, they share technological developments with the U.S. as part of the NATO
alliance. Israel has a "special relationship" with the United States, which assures Israel that the
U.S. will either defend them with our latest and best weapons systems, or give them modern-
enough hardware to repulse invaders. France is a U.S. ally, and is "in" on National Security secret
technology developments.
The membership of the renegade group in Japan has not been identified to me. But then, we
have a "renegade group" in this country, operating out of control of the President and the
Congress, yet in possession of crashed saucers, saucer technology, and the trillion$ it takes to
develop that technology. It is called the UFO Cover-Up organization.
II: > Why is the U.S. military today experimenting with a liquid crystal skin on aircraft, if they can
"bend light" to obtain optical invisibility?
RB: (See "cover" motive above.)
II: > This technology has been around for 26+ years and they're still puttering around in good ol'
conventional aircraft?
RB: (See "cover" motive above.)
II: > What's powering the craft? What is it's fuel? Where's the technical information?
RB: The sources are metering out information in installments.
ONI physicist Bob Lazar says that the antigravity craft he worked on used Element 115 as
fuel/power source.
Other sources (Colonel Steve Wilson, USAF, Dr. Michael Wolf, NSC, "Jesse" of NSA,
Colonel Donald Ware, USAF, etc. have each provided additional significant leaked information
about craft names, propulsion, power system characteristics, destinations, etc.
II: > Interestingly, this source seems to know more about the military's most secret projects than the military itself. I see no references, no
sources of information to check here, just a wild statement thrown onto the internet. As usual, It's hard to believe.
RB: In order for any officer to know about specifics of UFO programs, he'd have to be cleared ABOVE TOP SECRET for Special Access to Sensitive
Compartmented Information (SCI) in Unacknowledged Special Access Programs (USAPs), classified in the upper numeric Levels of Q clearance [30 or
higher],with ULTRA/UMBRA/COSMIC/KEYSTONE additional clearances. We are in the midst of an accelerated Acclimation Program by the Administration to
"leak" out information to the *interested* public. Because the releases of information are in stages, complete documentation and "references" are
not included at this stage. On the other hand, armed with the available information, an interested person could research the open literature and
government files and learn more. Are you interested enough to do that?
II: > onto the internet. As usual, It's hard to believe that the "former head of Project Pounce" would be freely blabbing about such things to
ANYONE,
RB: We are in a new era, where UFO information will be "leaking out" faster than anyone could have imagined likely five years ago.
II: > By the way, the head of this most secret project is a mere colonel?
RB: I defer to former military on this list, including at least one USAF Colonel, but it is my information that a lot gets done in the military by
"mere" colonels. Perhaps you have heard of Colonel John Alexander, for instance? Head of DIA's supersecret psychic warfare/psychotronic research.
II: > Unfortunately, the obligation of proof falls on the person making the outrageous claims -- of course, that never stopped anyone on this list...
RB: Don't fall into the sophisms of the debunkers. What is going on in the Acclimation Program is not publishing of academic papers with copious
references, but a covert political process of belatedly educating the interested portion of the public about matters so advanced behind the scenes for
decades, that the developments boggle the uninformed imagination.
- Richard Boylan, Ph.D.
www.drboylan.com... 
