It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mobius1974
reply to post by mr-lizard
They have families.. They went into this with the understanding that this was going to be their career/ their income.. Little did they know, that bunch of theives with a sense of entitlement would be forcing them to alter their business plan.. Its 100% pathetic.
Originally posted by iterationzero
Originally posted by Mobius1974
reply to post by mr-lizard
They have families.. They went into this with the understanding that this was going to be their career/ their income.. Little did they know, that bunch of theives with a sense of entitlement would be forcing them to alter their business plan.. Its 100% pathetic.
Before you make statements like this, do a little research as to why Radiohead and Trent Reznor have broken ties with the mainstream music industry in favor of a DIY distribution model and working with smaller independent labels. It's because they realized the "music industry", as it stands today, doesn't have the best interests of the artists or their fans in mind. That being said, the real test is going to be if an artist that is not already established can pull it off. It's one thing when you've been selling out arena shows for the better part of a decade - you have a fan base that will likely follow you wherever you go at that point. If someone can create a fan base of that size and that loyalty from an online presence, that will truly signal the death knell for the industry.
Originally posted by Mobius1974
reply to post by mr-lizard
I apologize if you fit that mold... But as it stands right now..
Lets use taproot as an example...
They record a CD .. They release that CD..
There business model is based on sales of the CD... If their "fans" all Download the CD .. They loose money.. PERIOD!!!!
For every download.. you could argue that is a lost sale... If you take something for free, that is not offered for free.. THAT, in my opinion, is leeching/stealing.
Originally posted by Mobius1974
reply to post by mr-lizard
Lets use taproot as an example...
They record a CD .. They release that CD..
There business model is based on sales of the CD... If their "fans" all Download the CD .. They loose money.. PERIOD!!!!
Taproot are about to get f****d! Welcome to the club!
The lawsuit also asserts Victory has received more than $10 million in revenue from Hawthorne Heights CDs, DVDs and merchandise, yet the label still claims the band owes Victory more than $1 million.
Originally posted by serbsta
Well I think this is pretty much it...
On the one hand I do think that online piracy is just that... piracy, stealing. But on the other hand, I place huge blame on the media authorities who refuse to adopt new techniques of doing business that would allow them to utilize these new technologies.