It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Heliocentric
I'd like to know why all the remote viewers reports seem to be coherently talking about dug down hidden structures on Mars. If it's just figments of imagination, why doesn't it take off in all different directions?
Originally posted by ArMaP
are those people following ATS? All those images were discussed here some time ago.
Originally posted by trailertrash
Now I want to report my own conclusions regarding those targets on Mars.
There is water below the surface the pressures of which are varied quite a bit by the ordinary things that a planet experiences in rotation. None of this need by recounted here.
At times a semi-frozen slurry breaks the surface and shows as a flow of some sort. These are often seen in craters as though the crater is being filled from below. Sometimes the crater rim is broken where the mass bursts free and makes an escape. When the pressure of the localized "burping" is spent however, the flow stops and freezes solid. This example is found where the paths to the surface cause the upwelling water to mix with soils.
Now in the case of the "glass tubes". These are produced by clear water erupting from a rocky aquifer. But, as in the muddy flows, the flows are of short duration. "Burping" is a good descriptor because it is exactly what happens. The interval between the segments of the tubes tells us of the volume of the water which is ejected from below. It flows suddenly then retreats just as suddenly leaving a relatively thin clear icy shell as sign of it's waxing and waning. A series of these "burps" results in a long variated, segmented tube. In the target we see a less seldom secondary event which is only a bit of compressed "air" and maybe some liquid which has ruptured a thin place in the ice looking like a fountain.
There is no intelligent life responsible for any of this. It is mother nature doing her thing. No biggie.
I've just provided you all with my own "remote viewing" in the above. Does it seem plausible? I am confident of it's correctness. Remember that pendulum thing which says that the simplest explanation is almost certainly the correct one.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Well some guy who was supposed to be one of the worlds best remote viewers was on UK tv recently, he was supposed to figure out the location of a target person and even although they both were in the same city, well lets just say we could have come up with as much info by guessing!!!
Originally posted by Astyanax
All it needs is a TV camera, an encoder and a radio transmitter.
The Mars Rovers are great at remote viewing.
Originally posted by ArMaP
I don't think they show them any image, that's why it's called it "in the blind" or something like that.