It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Christine O'Donnel would not help Jews evade Nazi persecution

page: 1
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 12:34 PM
link   
Just found this on YouTube, sorry if it had been posted:



So basically she's fashionably vague, but hints she would just let Nazis know that there are Jews hiding in her house. How sweet.




posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 12:38 PM
link   
She said she'd never tell a lie .. for any reason ... That's a bit different than your SPIN

She said she doesn't lie and wouldn't lie because it's a sin and she won't knowingly sin for any reason.

Put it in context.

While I would lie for what I consider a good reason. She won't. Period.

Lots of politicians lie for what they think are good reasons.

You'd rather have one that lies????



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 12:40 PM
link   
I saw this too. She was basically saying that it is NEVER ok to lie. However, I don't believe she thought this all the way through before making that statement. The lie was Hitler's agenda, so any subsequent lie to protect the Jews could not possibly be a lie; rather a correction/protection of the truth.

Statements like this just shows how dim she is and perfectly illustrate why she should not be elected.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 12:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by FlyersFan
She said she'd never tell a lie .. for any reason ... That's a bit different than your SPIN

She said she doesn't lie and wouldn't lie because it's a sin and she won't knowingly sin for any reason.

Put it in context.

While I would lie for what I consider a good reason. She won't. Period.


It's funny that you allege I'm trying to pull a "SPIN" on you, while you are basically saying exact same thing that I said, in your own words! Which is, she would betray the Jews and send them to gas chambers because she can't be bothered to lie to a sadistic bunch of criminals that Nazis were.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by buddhasystem

Originally posted by FlyersFan
She said she'd never tell a lie .. for any reason ... That's a bit different than your SPIN

She said she doesn't lie and wouldn't lie because it's a sin and she won't knowingly sin for any reason.

Put it in context.

While I would lie for what I consider a good reason. She won't. Period.


It's funny that you allege I'm trying to pull a "SPIN" on you, while you are basically saying exact same thing that I said, in your own words! Which is, she would betray the Jews and send them to gas chambers because she can't be bothered to lie to a sadistic bunch of criminals that Nazis were.


Your spin is that you are posting something out of context for a situation that neither O'Donnell (or anyone else) would ever find themselves in. Nothing more than another conservative woman getting the "Palin treatment" at the hands of libs that like to pretend they're all for women NOT being discriminated against.


Of course, that also makes you all hypocrites.






edit on 9/20/2010 by centurion1211 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 01:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211
Your spin is that you are posting something out of context for a situation that neither O'Donnell (or anyone else) would ever find themselves in.


True, I'm not expecting Adolf Hitler at my doorstep any time soon. However, there is a dose of demagoguery in your statement. You see, it's perfectly OK to question yourself (and may be others) about what they would do in certain situations. You see an injured person on a freeway, would you stop to help them? Note, that is purely hypothetical and maybe not likely to happen, but it's a fair question regardless. And she blew it. Big time.


Nothing more than another conservative woman getting the "Palin treatment" at the hands of libs that like to pretend they're all for women NOT being discriminated against.


I'm not even a liberal, actually. Anyhow, you are deflecting the argument altogether by alleging that gender is an issue in the topic of the OP. So count two for your demagoguery here.


Of course, that also make you all hypocrites.


See above.


You know centurion, it must be difficult to be you at times, because one of your idols gets exposed as an incompetent fool crossed with a religious nut.


edit on 20-9-2010 by buddhasystem because: typo



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 01:38 PM
link   
Aside from the political issue of the danger of O'Donnel, seeing this video made me realize something. I would lie in that situation. I don't lie in my life and have always stood firm in that. But I never considered that kind of hypothetical situation. And I would lie. You bet I would lie to protect someone's life.

Why didn't she just get down of her high horse and say that she would lie? As with most things in life, it's not black and white.

It's appropriate, centurion, that you would bring up Sarah Palin because this girl is VERY much like her from what I've seen. Maybe that's what made her run. "Hey, I'm like Sarah Palin! I should run for office! And then write a book when I fail."



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 01:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by buddhasystem

Originally posted by centurion1211
Your spin is that you are posting something out of context for a situation that neither O'Donnell (or anyone else) would ever find themselves in.


True, I'm not expecting Adolf Hitler at my doorstep any time soon. However, there is a dose of demagoguery in your statement. You see, it's perfectly OK to question yourself (and may be others) about what they would do in certain situations. You see an injured person on a freeway, would you stop to help them? Note, that is purely hypothetical and maybe not likely to happen, but it's a fair question regardless. And she blew it. Big time.


Nothing more than another conservative woman getting the "Palin treatment" at the hands of libs that like to pretend they're all for women NOT being discriminated against.


I'm not even a liberal, actually. Anyhow, you are deflecting the argument altogether by alleging that gender is an issue in the topic of the OP. So count two for your demagoguery here.


Of course, that also make you all hypocrites.


See above.


Instead see below ...

not a liberal ... At least I don't (have to) pretend to be anything other than my true self.


Seems to be more and more "closet liberals" these days for some reason.


Here is a thread started by YOU where you attack Palin in a similar way as you are doing with this thread.

Palin attack thread by buddhasystem

Guilty as charged ...



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 01:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211
Here is a thread started by YOU where you attack Palin in a similar way as you are doing with this thread.

Palin attack thread by buddhasystem


Oh, so any video exposing one of your idols in an unattractive light is now considered an "attack"? Look, it's actual video of them presenting in public! It's not a cartoon or CGI. If you consider that an "attack", you must be having hard time facing the reality.

So let's recap -- O'Donnel goes on record saying that she would reveal presence of Jews to the Nazis. Palin rolls eyes when finding out she actually speaks to a teacher. How cool is that?



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 01:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic

It's appropriate, centurion, that you would bring up Sarah Palin because this girl is VERY much like her from what I've seen. Maybe that's what made her run. "Hey, I'm like Sarah Palin! I should run for office! And then write a book when I fail."


O'Donnell is like Palin in that she is a conservative woman that for some reason must also be scaring libs/dems to the point that they feel they must engage in these witch hunts (carefully chosen words) against them.

It's also appropriate that I call out people for being hypocrites in that they pretend to support women's rights and women getting ahead, breaking the glass ceiling, etc., but trashing them in the most juvenile and petty ways whenever they try. Now if a conservative dares criticize obama? Of course libs/dems immediately play the race card.

More "witch hunt" examples brought to us by buddhasystem

thread



edit on 9/20/2010 by centurion1211 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 01:52 PM
link   
So how did the Jews get in her house? I would think that she would have helped them hide, no? Or did they simply break in?

Is that the only "dirt" you can find on the girl?

If we keep throwing mud and blood on people that run for office, what kind of people will we have running for office? Those that can throw mud and blood with the best of them I suppose.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 01:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Stewie
So how did the Jews get in her house? I would think that she would have helped them hide, no? Or did they simply break in?


Did you even bother to see the video? Did you hear "Anne Frank"? Do you think Anne Frank was a burglar? Sheesh.


Is that the only "dirt" you can find on the girl?


If Karl Rove refers to her as having a "checkered past", I suppose she has many shortcomings. Who doesn't? But that betraying Jews thing is just icing on that idiotic cake.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 01:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by FlyersFan
She said she'd never tell a lie .. for any reason ... That's a bit different than your SPIN

She said she doesn't lie and wouldn't lie because it's a sin and she won't knowingly sin for any reason.

Put it in context.

While I would lie for what I consider a good reason. She won't. Period.

Lots of politicians lie for what they think are good reasons.

You'd rather have one that lies????


FlyersFan, BuddhaSystem is just a hater. As lame as Christine is, I'd rather have her than an avowed Socialist supporting everything Obama pushes. Christine is less dangerous.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 02:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211
O'Donnell is like Palin in that she is a conservative woman


That isn't all. They are Two Peas in a Pod



To quote Jon Stewart, "The Palin is strong in this one."





posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 02:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by SeaWind
FlyersFan, BuddhaSystem is just a hater. As lame as Christine is, I'd rather have her than an avowed Socialist supporting everything Obama pushes. Christine is less dangerous.


Yeah, sure, Obama bailing out banks without getting voting shares is a pinnacle of socialism. As is the wonderful public healthcare option we now all enjoy. What a commie, Obama.

And Christine really shines compared to him, doesn't she? Plus, she opposes masturbation. Choice is clear! Keep hands out of your pants and vote O'Donnel!



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 02:09 PM
link   
reply to post by buddhasystem
 

Oh, so she would kill Anne Frank, or have her killed. You should have put that in the title.

You know, the penalty for hiding a Jew was pretty severe. Would you have risked it?





edit on 20-9-2010 by Stewie because: past tense proper



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Stewie
reply to post by buddhasystem
 

Oh, so she would kill Anne Frank, or have her killed. You should have put that in the title.

You know, the penalty for hiding a Jew was pretty severe. Would you risk it?


I simply don't know. I might. Not unlikely. And I would definitely deny Nazis intel any way I can, whereas our dear Christine would obviously volunteer it just on general principles. Good girl.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 02:13 PM
link   
Well being a Libertarian, if caught in such a seeteation, I would put a couple 9 mm in the heads of the guys knocking on the door. Then, I would put a couple well placed high powered rifle rounds in the engine block of the vehicle they had, then finishing those in the vehicle. After burying all the bodies in the back field, I would then plant the vehicle in the nazi sympathizers property.

I am sure Maher would be one of them so it would be a great day all around.




edit on 20-9-2010 by saltheart foamfollower because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 02:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by buddhasystem

Originally posted by Stewie
reply to post by buddhasystem
 

Oh, so she would kill Anne Frank, or have her killed. You should have put that in the title.

You know, the penalty for hiding a Jew was pretty severe. Would you risk it?


I simply don't know. I might. Not unlikely. And I would definitely deny Nazis intel any way I can, whereas our dear Christine would obviously volunteer it just on general principles. Good girl.


If you have no clue ... as to what you would do or would have done in a similar situation, you also have no business criticizing someone else for their responses. It's why I call what you and others are doing a hypocritical witch hunt. Simple as that.



posted on Sep, 20 2010 @ 02:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic

Originally posted by centurion1211
O'Donnell is like Palin in that she is a conservative woman


That isn't all. They are Two Peas in a Pod



To quote Jon Stewart, "The Palin is strong in this one."




Or you could simply try some of your own medicine as expressed in this thread titled - appropriately - "Why do we "Hate" Those With Whom We Disagree?"



new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join