posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:05 PM
Originally posted by Tosskey
Where are the level headed conspiracy theorists that can accept that 'terrorists' crashed planes into buildings, but think the US Government was
complicit in either perpetrating the hijackings, or atleast just turning a blind eye to it? Not that I think that's the case, personally, but I just
find it funny that most conspiracy theorists immediately jump to the absolute least unlikely scenarios.
edit on 13-3-2011 by Tosskey because:
(no reason given)
I agree holograms etc., is silly but to say controlled demolition didn't happen means you have not looked at the evidence.
For the towers without going into a lot of detail, as it is in plenty of other threads if you bothered to look, Newtons laws of motion proves the OS
impossible. 30 floors can not crush 80 floors without being crushed themselves (equal opposite reactions), so the 30 floors would run out before the
80 floors did. And that's even IF the collapse happened according to the OS. Personally I don't think the collapse should have happened at all
from one hour of fire. But regardless the OS does not offer a logical explanation as to how it could happen. Even Bazants paper, that claims to
explain it, requires a large mass of floors to still be in the footprint of the towers, yet there are none.
The majority of WTC 7 landed in its own footprint, evidenced by post collapse pictures, i.e. all four outer walls were on top of the collapsed
building. This is only possible from a controlled implosion demolition.
This is why the OS is in question, and should be.