Giant Spaceships Heading Towards Earth ?

reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX


You linked to an e-mail exchange about Pulsars. (or, rapidly rotating Neutron stars).

There are no Pulsars in our vicinity. According to WikiAnswers, the closest one to us is about 280 LY (estimated).

(Perhaps Anthro's space Mom can go check it out, for you?)

You might worry too much, but you do have an incredible imagination.


Like, "jesus"... Guy who never existed, in all likelihood. Or, at least, not in the overly-hyped way that's been embellished, portrayed, for nearly 2,000 years. Still, people buy that junk, hook line and sinker. :shk:

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX

 

What do you think it is?
It's a pulsar that is 10,400 light years away from Earth. (3.2kpc)
arxiv.org...

I read the whole thing and they are talking about two pulsating ah! check it out and please tell me?

For this reason, I have been thinking of proposing for an Arecibo
search at 327 MHz. However, there is a problem, in that I have some
other important time commitments:

1) Just finished a paper on the re-parameterization of the Shapiro
delay, a fundamental result that will give us a much improved GR test
in binary systems where the Shapiro delay is measured. This will be
sumbitted to MNRAS within a week or so (it is going through internal
refereeing here at MPIfR).

2) Furthermore, I am working now on the paper on the mass of
1903+0327, obtained with Arecibo data. This will be submitted to
Science in about a month's time. This is a fundamental result, with
very firm exclusion of several EOSs.

3) After that, I will be working on a paper on a new test of the
Strong Equivalence Principle, also using Arecibo's data on PSR
J1903+0327. This new method will eventually beat everything else in
this field, including Lunar Laser Ranging, but doing it in the strong
field regime. This paper will be submitted to Phys Rev D in April/May.

So, basically, my problem with submitting another Fermi Arecibo
search proposal is that I also have other things to do that I find at
least, if not more interesting.

*** I could not resist and ended up submitting it.

Cheers,

Paulo

Verry interresting link ....

There is another result relative to the Fermi work, which is still
"secret". For the last 5 years, I have been timing PSR J1741+1351
(p2176). The results are not yet published, but they are very
interesting: proper motion, parallax, a reasonably good estimate of
the mass from the Shapiro delay, and a measurement of the change in
apparent orbital size due to the proper motion. This gives us a good
estimate of the orientation of the system in space. I am aiming for a
publication time later this year.

It makes you wonder.... are they really talking about a pulsar.... or do they know more ?

reply to post by css1981

The "secret" is that the scientist thinks he may have found a new and better way to test the strong equivalence principle.
en.wikipedia.org...

They are talking about pulsars.

Originally posted by css1981
Verry interresting link ....

There is another result relative to the Fermi work, which is still
"secret". For the last 5 years, I have been timing PSR J1741+1351
(p2176). The results are not yet published, but they are very
interesting: proper motion, parallax, a reasonably good estimate of
the mass from the Shapiro delay, and a measurement of the change in
apparent orbital size due to the proper motion. This gives us a good
estimate of the orientation of the system in space. I am aiming for a
publication time later this year.

It makes you wonder.... are they really talking about a pulsar.... or do they know more ?

Yup and that too, what in the world these people are hiding?

reply to post by css1981


"...do they know more?" ???

Just input the designation for that pulsar....I did, and got hits. Like THIS ONE.

Not very mysterious, or "secret" now, is it???

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by css1981

 

The "secret" is that the scientist thinks he may have found a new and better way to test the strong equivalence principle.
en.wikipedia.org...

They are talking about pulsars.

Well thats what I mean, they are colling it something els. Could this be truth?

reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX

What they are calling what? What are you talking about?
They are very specific about what they are doing. Just because you don't understand a word of it does not mean it's in code.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX

 

What they are calling what? What are you talking about?
They are very specific about what they are doing. Just because you don't understand a word of it does not mean it's in code.

Ok, ok I will not have any assumptions, cause your right I really don't understand much of this stuff, but somebody will.

Any way I will keep searching and see what I'll fined, but I don't like the sound of it I tell you that much.

So Having asked for up to date pictures of said portion of sky is Off topic?? hows that work?

Wohoo!! look what I found ah! PDF the second one.

www.naic.edu...

Ok I whant to hear it!! what you have to say about this?

reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX

Say about what? Don't tell me you're talking about the "UFO" bit. Ok, here's what I have to say about it.

That is a report from a student project. Students learning about how to use the Arecibo radio telescope and it's hard to tell exactly what they are talking about since it's a powerpoint presentation with no text to go along with it. I see a galaxy (several, actually), various spectral emission plots, and a hokey flying saucer picture.

Project Code: AO-4, GBT-4
Title : HI Emission in Extended Galaxies
Advisors : Drs. K. O'Neil (GBT) & C. J. Salter (AO)
Students : Rik Williams, Prasanth Nair, Stephen Redman, Maarten Baes (AO-4).
Sabrina Stierwalt, Sabina Sabatini, Cristy Bredeson, Simona Toscano (GBT-4)

This project is designed to demonstrate the fundamentals of spectral line observing. Two different groups will observe the same galaxies using the GBT (one group) and Arecibo (the 2nd group). Of the galaxies observed, a number have HI emission known to extend beyond the Arecibo beam, while some do not. The results from the two telescopes will be compared to determine the extent of the sources. Beam maps of the Arecibo telescope will also be made, as well as calibration (gain) measurements for both telescopes. These will be used to both to calibrate the data and to aid in understanding the results.

www.naic.edu...

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX

 

Say about what? Don't tell me you're talking about the "UFO" bit. Ok, here's what I have to say about it.

That is a report from a student project. Students learning about how to use the Arecibo radio telescope and it's hard to tell exactly what they are talking about since it's a powerpoint presentation with no text to go along with it. I see a galaxy, various spectral emission plots, and a hokey flying saucer picture.

Project Code: AO-4, GBT-4
Title : HI Emission in Extended Galaxies
Advisors : Drs. K. O'Neil (GBT) & C. J. Salter (AO)
Students : Rik Williams, Prasanth Nair, Stephen Redman, Maarten Baes (AO-4).
Sabrina Stierwalt, Sabina Sabatini, Cristy Bredeson, Simona Toscano (GBT-4)

This project is designed to demonstrate the fundamentals of spectral line observing. Two different groups will observe the same galaxies using the GBT (one group) and Arecibo (the 2nd group). Of the galaxies observed, a number have HI emission known to extend beyond the Arecibo beam, while some do not. The results from the two telescopes will be compared to determine the extent of the sources. Beam maps of the Arecibo telescope will also be made, as well as calibration (gain) measurements for both telescopes. These will be used to both to calibrate the data and to aid in understanding the results.

www.naic.edu...

edit on 9/22/2010 by Phage because: (no reason given)

Ah ha ha ha ha you jumping my discovery lol so you really don't whant to admit it ah! I said look... never mined I got the official photos I'll post them in a few minutes.

Jeez they are cut! how can I fit it in the page? I bet you dint see this either right?


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/807d2140062d.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4a0afc4e979a.png[/atsimg]

I don't like the sound of the crickets.

reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX


Yes. I did. That's what I'm talking about.
Notice the names. It's the students' project.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX

 

Yes. I did. That's what I'm talking about.
Notice the names. It's the students' project.

edit on 9/22/2010 by Phage because: (no reason given)

Phage I bet you must be a bright person but I think I don't need to be an expert to believe what I'm seeing in front of me.

Thanks any way, now I'll let people to have their take on this.

reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX


BIONICLE ALEX.....

Notwithstanding I still think you are having us all on.....

Jeez they are cut! how can I fit it in the page?

With slider bars.....





Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX

You don't need to be an expert to believe anything at all. But a little knowledge helps in knowing what you're looking at.

I'm no expert but I do know what those charts represent and I do know that graduate students on summer school in Puerto Rico might get a little silly when presenting the results of their project. That sunshine and sandy beaches can do that.

reply to post by Maybe...maybe not


WHAT!! after all this you still think that I'm fooling you? Ok now so I know is not me, and my God man you need to see an eye doctor or something cause if this is not proof enough for you, Then I don't know what is.