It seems that after all these years that my thesis was up to review, not ONE professional seismologist had the insight to really review my work, and
find out the crux of the matter I showed them :
I connected a NIST timestamped photo by Mr Cianca, showing the first forming of a dent in the roof of the eastern penthouse, with the WTC 7 collapse
seismogram from LDEO which has also precise timestamps on the time-axle.
NOTE here, that both institutes are very official USA ones, and no data in my thesis ever originated from any experiments by myself, or altered
I used pure unaltered data and data-streams offered by official governmental institutions.
And that gave every damn professional seismologist on Earth the once-in-a-lifetime possibility to compare the REAL speed of the different seismic
signals traveling through the upper crust of the state of New York of a real-time sudden history-changing seismic event, and not a known in advance
experiment like quarry explosions which were referenced by Dr Kim and his co-writers.
Remember, Dr Kim explicitly explained to the world why he came to the 2 seconds per KM and thus 17 seconds traveling time of the WTC towers collapse
signals through the upper crust in his Nov.2001 publication.
He based that on many years of numerous other seismic experiments where the time and place of origin of any explosion was well known by the
Dr Kim held on for several years to his believe expressed in his first, November 2001 publication, that surface signals like f.ex. Rayleigh waves
propagated through the upper crust from Manhattan to the Palisades seismic station, 34 km north of New York, with a speed of 2 km per second. Which
means that those WTC towers collapse signals needed 17 seconds to reach the needles of the seismographs at Palisades station.
Then, after taking notice of my work, NIST suddenly retracted all later than 2004 seismic studies from its WTC pages, and pressured Dr Kim, who now
worked FOR them on another Jan 2006 publication (which was never to be found anymore in NIST its pages) to slightly change his propagation speed
figures, based on a tiny signal NIST said to be the earliest signal arriving from Manhattan.
That only enforced my thesis.
Have a good look again on my big seismic diagram and all notes in it, and then perhaps you understand why the black line under it, with my ""you need
a lot of extra energy input"" note in it, is so damn important for the whole WTC 7 collapse story.
All these French seismologists and also the other global professionals took those Dr Kim figures for granted.
While I simply connected the time attached to the Cianca photo at the place of origin, with the time at the place of collection, the LDEO seismic
station at Palisades, NY.
And thus proved them wrong.
Click this FULL 890x766 pixels diagram link.
So now explain to me, why the biggest seismic signals magnitudes were collected already at the LDEO seismic station 34 KM north of
Manhattan, BEFORE that point in time that the dent in the WTC 7 eastern penthouse roof STILL HAD TO BEGIN TO FORM
Don't come up again with the lame excuse of ONE column 79 giving way, collapsing and causing that HUGE pack of signals. Hogwash !
Because : why had the following pack of signals then an amplitude several orders less than the first ones.
Those were the signals showing a global collapse of a 47 story building, with ALL its internal and external columns giving way, and it was about half
the height in floors as the Twin Towers.
Not many more of these kind of huge high rises to be found elsewhere.
And give please also a logical conclusion why 2.3 seconds of free fall did not result in a hammer effect on the NY bedrock soil of the
huge weight of 44 floors hammering down in free fall for 2.3 seconds and then suddenly halted by the still attached to the hard rock soil, still
intact bottom-7 floors of the building, and logically had to show thus much bigger amplitude signals than the first pack of signals, which they DID
NOT, however. The last pack of signals showing the supposed global collapse of the whole building is much lower in seismic signals amplitudes than the
first, much bigger in amplitude signals.
I'm still flabbergasted why not one person on earth ever saw in all these past 5 years what my annotations on that LDEO - WTC 7 collapse seismogram
together with my connected Cianca photo time-stamp by NIST meant for NIST's WTC 7 official and FINAL hogwash-story.
QUESTIONS section :
Do you believe that on 911 the propagation speed of seismic signals in the upper New York State crust suddenly changed for a few moments, and then
afterwards returned again to its well known 17 KM per second value?
Then you also believe in Santa Claus.
Or do you start to doubt your former beliefs and begin to believe my diagram annotations?
Then you are becoming a Reborn Truther.
[ Click CTRL together with the "+" key several times, and you will be able to zoom in this whole page in your Firefox browser, so you can clearly read
my forum fixed seismic diagram in blown-up text-format.
Also a very fine feature for the eyesight impaired Elders on this board, you don't get a headache anymore from the tiny normal ATS page scripts.]
Do you start to doubt the whole WTC 7 seismic diagram, so hastily put on line on the Friday after Tuesday, 11 September 2001.?
(The other LDEO seismic diagrams were already posted online on Wednesday! ).
Because that's the only sane explanation of my annotations on my WTC 7 seismic diagram, full of my remarks.
1. You can't attack the Cianca photo its NIST time stamp, which is still kept upright by NIST to this day.
It was calculated by using very precise GEOS atomic clock times from NIST and corroborated by the network videos attached time stamps on their
abundant video material.
2. You can't attack the many years of experience by LDEO regarding the propagation speed of seismic waves through the upper crust of New York State,
being 2 km/sec.
Their Palisades seismic station is 34 km from the southern tip of Manhattan, the WTC complex. Thus it takes Raleigh waves 17 seconds to get to the
needles of the LDEO Palisades seismic station equipment.
Thus, the WTC 7 seismic chart of the collapse sequence, is false.
Anybody has another idea which explains the discrepancies in that chart?
edit on 18/9/10 by LaBTop because: Changed STRG to CTRL, so repeatedly click CTRL-and-+ to zoom a forum page in.!