Originally posted by nottheonlyone
1.) Then what is there to cover up?
2.) They could have gotten the people out and then explained that the building needed to come down.
3.) How did they get the bombs in the building if it was one fire.
4.) WTC 1 and 2 fell less than 2 hrs after the planes hit.
5.) Reports and recordings of NY firefighters state that fires in all 3 buildings where almost out shortly before the buildings fell.
1. You tell us.
2. They couldn't get the people out because there was no way to get the people out. All the stairs and elevators were unusuable at and above the
plane strikes.
3. Below the plane strikes the buildings were basically empty. Plenty of time to tell everyone the buildins are coming down then walk up and place
thermite charges.
4. By that time someone said, "how the heck are we going to put these fires out?" "These things could burn for weeks".
5. Funny, your question 3 seems to contradict your question 5. You claim the fires were almost out but also claim no one could plant charges because
the buildings were on fire. Which one is it? Were the fires almost out or not? But let's explore this further.
Who put the fires almost out? The fires were dozens of stories up. They had hoses that long? The sprinkler system was out. So tell me, these fires
put themselves almost out as you claim? The heat was so intense they couldn't even get near the top floors. People were jumping out of the
building. They basically helped get people out. They did no firefighting on that day.
So many fireman were running around all it would take is for someone to put on a fireman's suit and plant thermite charges.
Matter of fact, where is the "how do we put out the WTC Towers if they ever caught fire above 80 floors" disaster plan? I would like to read for
myself what OFFICIALS claim to be the best way to put out WTC Tower fires.
